Considering mineralization local-global geological features: An interpretable DCN-Transformer hybrid model with attribution for mineral prospectivity mapping
Abstract. Mineral prospectivity mapping is a critical task in mineral exploration, effectively integrating which demands models capable of capturing both local and global geological features. While deep learning models excel in this domain, their "black-box" nature often limits the trust and insights geologists can derive from their predictions. This paper introduces a novel and interpretable hybrid model to explicitly address this challenge. Our architecture synergistically combines a deformable convolutional network for adapting spatially varying local mineralization features, such as geochemical anomalies, a Transformer module for modelling long-range global-scale spatial features governing mineral deposition. A pivotal innovation is the incorporation of an attribution branching network that generates significance scores for each input predictive factor to the final prospectivity probability. These scores not only provide a direct interpretation of factor relevance but are also fed back to dynamically modulate the key values in the Transformer's attention mechanism, effectively injecting prior geological knowledge into the local and global feature learning process. This design fosters a more geologically informed integration of local and global representations. The model's performance is evaluated against benchmark models including standalone deformable convolutional network, Transformer, and a hybrid model with deformable convolutional network and Transformer. Results demonstrate a superior predictive accuracy and more geologically plausible prospectivity maps. Furthermore, we provide a multi-faceted interpretation framework: the attribution branching network quantifies the contribution of each evidence layer, while gradient-weighted class activation mapping visualizes the discriminative local regions highlighted by the convolutional components and attention maps reveal the long-range feature relationships prioritized by the Transformer to elucidate how the model hierarchically integrates local and global features to arrive at its decisions. This dual-path interpretation strategy demystifies the model's decision-making process, offering geologists tangible insights into both "where" and "why" the model identifies high-potential zones, thereby bridging the gap between high-performing deep learning and actionable c intelligence.
This paper proposes an interpretable DCN–Transformer hybrid model with attribution for mineral prospectivity mapping. The proposed framework is novel and potentially valuable. I recommend the authors address the following minor issues to further improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript.
1. Â Â It is suggested to adjust the subheadings of the methods section in Section 3. The proposed framework consists of four major components, whereas the current subsection structure only reflects three of them. I suggest revising the subsection organization so that it better corresponds to the overall framework and more clearly presents the model architecture and workflow.Â
2. Â Â Please check whether the title of Figure 4 is accurate. The current title refers to geochemical anomalies associated with mineralization, whereas the figure appears to present mineral prospectivity maps according to the description in the manuscript. The terminology should be made consistent.Â
3. Â Â Figure 7 presents the attribution results for ten mineral deposits and states that these deposits correspond to those shown in Figure 2. However, the deposits are not numbered in Figure 2, making it difficult for readers to establish the correspondence between the two figures. I suggest adding deposit numbers to Figure 2 or providing another clear way to link the deposits shown in the two figures.Â
4. Â Â In line 320: "Prior to model training, data augmentation, which was adopted in Yang and Zuo (2024), ..." Since data augmentation is an important part of the training process, I recommend briefly describing the augmentation strategy (e.g., augmentation operations and sample expansion) rather than relying solely on the citation. This would improve the completeness and reproducibility of the methodology.Â
5. Â Â The manuscript would benefit from careful proofreading. There are several grammatical and typographical errors:
1) the first sentence of the Abstract ("Mineral prospectivity mapping is a critical task in mineral exploration, effectively integrating which demands models capable of capturing both local and global geological features") contains a grammatical error.Â
2) the phrase "actionable c intelligence" in the Abstract appears to contain a typographical error.Â
3) There are grammatical errors in Line 73 "However, the above deep learning architecture which proficiency with local features also imposes a fundamental limitation..."
4) There are grammatical errors in Line 77 "The above deep learning architecture (CNN, GNN, and DCN) analyzing..."
A thorough language check is recommended before publication.