Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-261
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-261
26 May 2026
 | 26 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Non-monotonic response of dust deposition kinetics to low wind speeds

Ruochen Jia, Chaoqun Ba, Chao Zhang, Wennong Kuang, Yuan Liu, Zhigang Wang, Fang Liu, Zhiming Xin, Yuting Liu, Qun Ma, Lu Zong, Wei Liang, Jianqiang Qian, and Zhimin Liu

Abstract. Dry deposition is a major sink for mineral dust, yet its behavior under weak winds remains poorly constrained and is often parameterized monotonically with wind speed. Here we quantify size-resolved dust deposition kinetics in a large closed-circuit recirculating wind tunnel using a two-stage protocol (brief high-wind loading followed by low-wind deposition at 0, 2, 4, and 6 m s⁻¹). Cumulative deposition time series were measured with an array of collection trays, with the initial suspended dust loading recorded by an online concentration monitor. Particle sizes were characterized by laser diffraction and grouped into six diameter-threshold classes (PM₂.₅–PM₆₃). A first-order kinetic model captured the deposition evolution and yielded an asymptotic cumulative deposition (𝑎), rate coefficient (𝑘), characteristic time scale  (𝜏 = 1/𝑘), and initial deposition flux (𝐽0 = 𝑎𝑘). Across the tested wind speeds, net deposition for fine-to-medium particles (PM₂.₅–PM₄₀) is highest at 2 m s⁻¹ and becomes suppressed at higher speeds, with the strongest evidence for a peaked response in the 30 μm class. Quadratic fits across the four wind-speed levels suggest a potential maximum near 2–3 m s⁻¹. These measurements provide process-based constraints on low-wind dust deposition and highlight a potential intermediate-wind window that can inform and evaluate dry-deposition parameterizations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ruochen Jia, Chaoqun Ba, Chao Zhang, Wennong Kuang, Yuan Liu, Zhigang Wang, Fang Liu, Zhiming Xin, Yuting Liu, Qun Ma, Lu Zong, Wei Liang, Jianqiang Qian, and Zhimin Liu

Status: open (until 07 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ruochen Jia, Chaoqun Ba, Chao Zhang, Wennong Kuang, Yuan Liu, Zhigang Wang, Fang Liu, Zhiming Xin, Yuting Liu, Qun Ma, Lu Zong, Wei Liang, Jianqiang Qian, and Zhimin Liu
Ruochen Jia, Chaoqun Ba, Chao Zhang, Wennong Kuang, Yuan Liu, Zhigang Wang, Fang Liu, Zhiming Xin, Yuting Liu, Qun Ma, Lu Zong, Wei Liang, Jianqiang Qian, and Zhimin Liu
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 26 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Controlled wind tunnel experiments show that mineral dust dry deposition under calm and low winds is not monotonic. Deposition of fine-to-medium dust particles is weakest in still air, peaks at weak winds around 2-3 m s⁻¹, and is reduced again as stronger winds promote resuspension. These results provide process-based constraints for improving dust dry deposition schemes and dust budget estimates.
Share