Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-257
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-257
23 Jan 2026
 | 23 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).

Distinct bias structures for extratropical cyclones with strong or weak diabatic heating

Qidi Yu, Clemens Spensberger, Linus Magnusson, and Thomas Spengler

Abstract. The development of extratropical cyclones (ETCs) is often significantly altered by diabatic processes, yet the representation of these processes in numerical weather prediction models has been shown to lead to significant forecast biases. To provide a systematic quantification of 12-hour ETC forecast errors, this study uses a cyclone-centred composite framework for North Atlantic wintertime (DJF) ETCs using the ERA5 reanalysis for the period 1979 to 2022. Cyclones are categorised into strong and weak diabatic heating at the time of their maximum intensification based on the domain-averaged 70th and 30th percentiles of vertically integrated diabatic heating.

While both groups exhibit a systematic underestimation of cyclone intensity, the error structures are markedly distinct. The weak heating group is characterised by an intensity underestimation near the cyclone core, whereas the strong heating group features a pronounced southwestward displacement bias together with a domain-wide intensity underestimation.

After removing the displacement bias, the strong heating group reveals an overestimation of low-level winds within the cold conveyor belt, sting jet, and dry intrusion regions, but a clear underestimation of moisture transport in the warm sector. These biases are accompanied by a pronounced overestimation of 850 hPa kinematic frontogenesis near the centre, likely associated with the wind field errors, and a substantial overestimation of total column liquid water along the bent-back warm front. This overestimated liquid water is likely related to the stronger frontogenesis, which induces an over-intensified secondary circulation. In contrast, cyclones in the weak heating group exhibit an underestimation of wind speed and moisture near the centre, consistent with the near centre intensity underestimation. Our findings highlight the impact of diabatic heating on structural cyclone forecast biases that can guide future model improvements.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Qidi Yu, Clemens Spensberger, Linus Magnusson, and Thomas Spengler

Status: open (until 06 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Qidi Yu, Clemens Spensberger, Linus Magnusson, and Thomas Spengler
Qidi Yu, Clemens Spensberger, Linus Magnusson, and Thomas Spengler

Viewed

Total article views: 6 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
0 6 0 6 0 0 0
  • HTML: 0
  • PDF: 6
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 6
  • Supplement: 0
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jan 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jan 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 25 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 25 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Forecast biases of wintertime extratropical cyclones are quantified, distinguishing cyclones by their diabatic heating intensity. Forecasts feature a southwest displacement and underestimation in strength for cyclones with strong diabatic heating. For weaker diabatic heating, cyclones mainly feature a bias in strength. Specific biases are also identified for wind, moisture, temperature, and upper-level circulation fields. Our findings help to guide future model improvements.
Share