Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2547
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2547
08 May 2026
 | 08 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

A multi-decadal climatology of dust-on-snow from wet deposition in the Upper Colorado River Basin

Felix Yu, Daniel Feldman, Leah Gibson, and William Rudisill

Abstract. Dust-on-snow deposition is the dominant factor in earlier snowmelt timing in the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), which gets ~70 % of its annual streamflow from snowmelt. Previous studies have demonstrated the radiative effects of dust-on-snow deposition, but have not quantified what deposition types, whether from atmospheric turbulence (dry deposition) or hydrometeor scavenging (wet deposition), drive these radiative effects. Here, we produce a climatology of the total amount and type of dust-on-snow deposition in the UCRB using the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA-2) reanalysis dataset from 1980–2023 and evaluate its accuracy using Surface Atmosphere Integrated Laboratory (SAIL) field measurements taken in 2022 and 2023 and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) Snow Property Inversion from Remote Sensing (SPIReS) dust concentration data. The results show that wet deposition is the dominant form of dust-on-snow deposition in the UCRB, comprising 73.8 % of total dust deposition. Additionally, the eastern areas in the UCRB, particularly the Gunnison Watershed, experience 16 % higher wet deposition monthly totals (69.33 mg m-2) than the entire UCRB average (59.80 mg m-2). These results highlight the importance of persistent spatial patterns but also interannual variability in accounting for dust deposition. This climatology also contextualizes the long-term records of dust deposition by showing how the relationships between dust at several sites with decadal records project onto the entire Basin, while also supporting water resource planning, especially for areas with elevated wet deposition levels.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Felix Yu, Daniel Feldman, Leah Gibson, and William Rudisill

Status: open (until 19 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Felix Yu, Daniel Feldman, Leah Gibson, and William Rudisill
Felix Yu, Daniel Feldman, Leah Gibson, and William Rudisill
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 08 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Dust-on-snow deposition is a major factor affecting snowmelt timing and amount in the Upper Colorado River Basin, yet deposition types (wet vs. dry) and amounts have not been quantified across the region. Our analysis shows wet deposition comprises 73.8 % of the total, with areas around the Gunnison Watershed experiencing higher-than-average monthly wet deposition by 16 %. These findings highlight the importance of estimating dust deposition when planning water resources in dusty regions.
Share