Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2536
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2536
05 Jun 2026
 | 05 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Desired and unintended impacts of managed realignment in a macrotidal estuary under present-day and future compound events

Marta Payo Payo, Constantinos Matsoukis, Jennifer Brown, and Laurent Amoudry

Abstract. Increasing coastal risks and habitat losses have increased the interest in nature-based solutions for coastal protection. As such managed realignment (MR) is often presented as a win-win solution in rural areas. However, the level of coastal protection that MR can offer now and under climate change is still unclear. Evidence at the estuarine scale is scarce and existing studies rarely account for interactions between river discharge, tides and storm surge. We use a numerical model to assess estuarine-scale impacts of the Hesketh Out Marsh MR (UK) for storms scenarios under present and future sea level rise (SLR) conditions. Our scenarios were defined through repeated interactions with local actors and include river and ocean drivers combinations not previously explored. Results show that MR impacts are highly localised, spatially variable and storm dependent. The MR can reduce total water levels (TWL) upstream of the MR for storms on spring tides and reduce tidal range and surge. However, it can also have unintended consequences such as increasing inundation time opposite to the MR and raising TWL for storms on neap tides, low water levels (LWL) and river-induced water levels. SLR further amplifies these impacts by reducing TWL and increasing LWL as SLR increases. Our results suggest the MR ability to reduce water levels in estuaries may be overestimated when compound river-coastal extremes are not considered and underscores the need for comprehensive modelling and local engagement to achieve effective mitigation and adaptation at estuarine scale.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Marta Payo Payo, Constantinos Matsoukis, Jennifer Brown, and Laurent Amoudry

Status: open (until 17 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Marta Payo Payo, Constantinos Matsoukis, Jennifer Brown, and Laurent Amoudry
Marta Payo Payo, Constantinos Matsoukis, Jennifer Brown, and Laurent Amoudry
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 05 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Managed realignment can reduce coastal flood while support wildlife, but its benefits for coastal protection are unclear. At Hesketh Out Marsh, a modelling study shows that effects vary locally and depend on the storm and tides. The managed realignment can reduce upstream water levels but raise lower water levels and river water levels hindering drainage. Sea level rise amplifies these effects, and we risk overestimating water level reductions unless we consider both river and coastal events.
Share