A blue-band surface residual correction method for land aerosol optical depth retrieval from DQ-1 WSI
Abstract. Surface reflectance prior uncertainty remains a major source of error in land aerosol optical depth (AOD) retrieval, particularly over complex surfaces and for newly launched satellite sensors lacking long-term observations for constructing stable surface priors. Here, we develop a hybrid AOD retrieval framework for the DQ-1 Wide Swath Imager (WSI) that integrates a static surface reflectance prior, machine-learning-based blue-band surface residual correction, and a physically based lookup-table (LUT) inversion. A multi-band static surface prior is first constructed from quality-controlled clear-sky observations under low-aerosol-loading conditions. Rather than directly predicting AOD, a random forest model is used to estimate the residual between the static and reference surface terms at 0.443 μm from the static blue-band prior, top-of-atmosphere reflectance, NDVI, viewing geometry, and elevation. The corrected blue-band surface term is then propagated through the conventional LUT retrieval, thereby retaining the physical aerosol inversion framework while using machine learning only to mitigate surface-prior mismatch. MCD19A2 AOD is used exclusively in the offline stage to support the construction of LUT-derived reference surface terms and for independent cross-product spatial consistency assessment, whereas AERONET observations provide the primary ground-based validation. Relative to the static-prior LUT retrieval, residual correction reduces the AERONET-based RMSE from 0.256 to 0.107 and mean bias error from 0.187 to 0.059, while increasing the fraction of retrievals within the expected error envelope from 14.8 % to 55.6 %. Evaluation on a held-out scene further demonstrates that the model generalizes the relationship between static-prior error and the LUT-derived reference surface term, reducing the blue-band surface-term MAE from 0.0088 to 0.0044. On dates excluded from model training and internal validation, the retrieved DQ-1 WSI AOD also exhibits strong regional spatial consistency with MCD19A2 across 200,507 collocated pixels (R = 0.863, RMSE = 0.131, MAE = 0.093, MBE = 0.012, and regression slope = 0.99). These results indicate that the performance improvement primarily arises from alleviating blue-band surface-prior mismatch within the physical LUT inversion rather than from direct empirical fitting of AOD. The proposed framework therefore provides a physically interpretable strategy for improving land AOD retrieval from DQ-1 WSI over springtime complex surfaces and offers a transferable solution for new wide-swath sensors for which robust long-term surface reflectance priors are not yet available.
This manuscript presents a blue-band surface residual correction method for land aerosol optical depth (AOD) retrieval from DQ-1 WSI, combining machine-learning-based correction of the surface reflectance prior with a physically based LUT retrieval framework. The topic is relevant to AMT, and the reported results show a clear improvement over the static-prior retrieval. The manuscript is generally well structured, but several aspects of the methodology and validation require further clarification, particularly the role of MCD19A2 AOD in constructing the RF training target, the limited independent AERONET validation, and some details of the retrieval and post-processing procedures. These issues are important for assessing the robustness and reproducibility of the method, but do not appear to undermine the overall retrieval framework. I believe the manuscript can be considered for publication after the issues below are adequately addressed. My specific comments are listed below.