Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2504
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2504
01 Jun 2026
 | 01 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Snow depth retrieval over Pan-Arctic sea ice (2012–2021) using multi-source data and machine learning models

Mengmeng Li, Jianwei Ma, Yang Li, Juha Karvonen, Bin Cheng, Yingfei Wang, Haili Li, Yafei Nie, and Zheng Duan

Abstract. Snow depth is a critical climate indicator and a key parameter for Arctic sea ice retrieval. In this study, we retrieve pan-Arctic snow depth from 2012 to 2021 by integrating satellite altimetry, passive microwave brightness temperatures, and multi-source ground/airborne data. We employ four machine learning models—Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Random Forest (RF), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)—to leverage the complementary strengths of altimetry and microwave datasets while evaluating the performance of different machine learning (ML) architectures. Through permutation feature importance analysis, we identified that the 89 GHz polarization ratio has a significantly greater influence on snow depth retrieval over multi-year ice compared to that over first-year ice. Validation against Operation IceBridge and MOSAiC measurements reveals complementary strengths of snow retrieval among the models. The MLR model achieves the highest overall snow depth accuracy (root-means-square-error = 7.19 cm, correlation = 0.67 against OIB), while the LSTM demonstrates minimal mean bias of snow depth between satellite-based and in situ observations (1.98 cm against OIB; 0.30 cm against MOSAiC). All ML models exhibit robust generalization capabilities. Our retrieved snow depth products improved sea ice thickness estimation significantly, reducing bias between satellite-based and a standard climatology-based ice thickness product by nearly an order of magnitude. Our long-term snow products offer users a reliable, high-accuracy dataset for advancing Arctic energy budget modeling and sea ice studies.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of The Cryosphere.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Mengmeng Li, Jianwei Ma, Yang Li, Juha Karvonen, Bin Cheng, Yingfei Wang, Haili Li, Yafei Nie, and Zheng Duan

Status: open (until 13 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Mengmeng Li, Jianwei Ma, Yang Li, Juha Karvonen, Bin Cheng, Yingfei Wang, Haili Li, Yafei Nie, and Zheng Duan
Mengmeng Li, Jianwei Ma, Yang Li, Juha Karvonen, Bin Cheng, Yingfei Wang, Haili Li, Yafei Nie, and Zheng Duan
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
We retrieved Arctic snow depth (2012–2021) using satellite data and four machine learning methods. A simple linear regression performed best against independent aircraft data, while complex models overfit. A measurement at 89 GHz was key for older ice. Using our snow depth data greatly reduced errors in ice thickness estimates. This provides a reliable Arctic snow depth dataset.
Share