Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2493
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2493
01 Jun 2026
 | 01 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Modeling seismic site response to improve lacustrine paleoseismic records

Huitong Yang, Katleen Wils, Ariana Molenaar, Jasper Moernaut, Lei Wu, Roberto Urrutia, Mario Pino, and Maarten Van Daele

Abstract. Linking earthquake-triggered sedimentary imprints in lakes to ground motion parameters is essential for quantitative paleoseismology. However, current approaches rely on empirical ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) and use a single time-averaged shear-wave velocity (Vs30) as a simplified site response proxy for a whole lake. We established a 3D shear velocity model to compute site-specific GMPE predictions and applied 2D numerical site response simulations for Lake Riñihue, Chile, to evaluate local ground motions for the 1960 Mw 9.5 Valdivia and 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquakes. Even with site-specific Vs30 inputs, 2D simulations predict peak ground accelerations (PGA) and peak ground velocities (PGV) that exceed GMPE estimates by more than a factor of two. By stepwise modification of model properties and testing additional flat-layered reference models, we demonstrate that impedance contrasts between stratigraphic units influence overall ground motion amplification, whereas multi-scale basin geometry controls its spatial distribution, generating localized ground motion spikes. Earthquake shaking in lakes can produce surficial sediment remobilization (SSR) and soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS) in-situ. Comparison of site-specific ground motions with sedimentary records from lake cores shows that SSR and SSDS are independent processes controlled by different ground motion components. SSR depth is primarily controlled by slope angle and PGV, with its patchy spatial occurrence reflecting frequency-dependent site response, whereas SSDS is controlled by PGA, with different thresholds for progressively increasing deformation types, while also predicts deformation thickness. Our findings highlight that site-specific ground motion reconstruction is essential to accurately link ground motion parameters to lacustrine sedimentary imprints.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Huitong Yang, Katleen Wils, Ariana Molenaar, Jasper Moernaut, Lei Wu, Roberto Urrutia, Mario Pino, and Maarten Van Daele

Status: open (until 13 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Huitong Yang, Katleen Wils, Ariana Molenaar, Jasper Moernaut, Lei Wu, Roberto Urrutia, Mario Pino, and Maarten Van Daele
Huitong Yang, Katleen Wils, Ariana Molenaar, Jasper Moernaut, Lei Wu, Roberto Urrutia, Mario Pino, and Maarten Van Daele
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Lake sediments preserve traces of past earthquakes and can help reveal how strong the shaking was. We studied Lake Riñihue, Chile, affected by earthquakes in 1960 and 2010, by modelling its basin structure and simulating its response to earthquake shaking. Lake floor shaking can be about twice as strong as empirical estimations, because sediment layers and basin geometry amplify shaking unevenly. Our results further show that different sediment imprints record different shaking components.
Share