Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2429
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2429
08 May 2026
 | 08 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Brief Communication: Comparing ICESat-2 Altimetry and COSMO-SkyMed Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry Grounding Zone Products over Antarctica

Ankita Vashishtha and Pietro Milillo

Abstract. The grounding line represents a critical boundary in ice sheet dynamics, delineating the point at which an ice sheet detaches from its bed and begins to float as an ice shelf. Various methodologies have been developed to identify grounding lines, each leveraging distinct observational and processing techniques. However, there is a notable scarcity in the literature when it comes to comprehensive cross-comparisons of these different approaches. Here, we focus on a comparative analysis of a recent grounding line dataset derived from NASA’s ICESat-2 altimetry data and the COSMO-SkyMed (CSK) synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery provided by the Italian Space Agency (ASI), covering Antarctica between 2020 and 2021. Across 73 Antarctic glaciers spanning ~69,440 km of grounding line, we evaluate the landward limit of tidal flexure (F), break in slope (Ib), and inland hydrostatic limit (H). Results indicate an average discrepancy relative to DInSAR grounding lines of 177 ±325 meters (F), 40 ± 830 meters (Ib), and 4508 ± 2731 meters (H). Contrary to the expectation that F lies closest to the grounding line, the F-GL discrepancy exceeds the Ib – GL discrepancy, reversing the expected ranking (F< Ib <H). Our findings advocate for the continued development and cross-validation of diverse methodologies to enhance the precision of ice sheet boundary monitoring and improve understanding of Antarctic ice dynamics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ankita Vashishtha and Pietro Milillo

Status: open (until 19 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ankita Vashishtha and Pietro Milillo
Ankita Vashishtha and Pietro Milillo
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 08 May 2026
Download
Short summary
This study compares the grounding line positions derived from COSMO SkyMed InSAR and ICESat-2 data over Antarctica. Three grounding zone indicators, F, Ib, and H, are evaluated against the DInSAR grounding line across 73 glaciers. Mean offsets are 177 ± 325 m (F), 40 ± 830 m (Ib), and 4508 ± 2731 m (H). Results show unexpected ordering (F > Ib), highlighting inconsistencies and the need for cross-validation in grounding line mapping.
Share