| 08 May 2026
Long-Term Open-Path Dual-Comb Spectroscopy for Urban CO2 Monitoring
Abstract. Accurate quantification of urban greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can benefit from path-averaged, high-precision, high-temporal-resolution measurements that complement point sensors and passive remote sensing. Among open-path techniques, dual-comb spectroscopy (DCS) stands out as a particularly capable candidate, offering simultaneous broadband coverage, an absolute SI-traceable frequency axis, and sufficient spectral radiance for multi-kilometer paths. Here we present an open-path dual-comb spectrometer using two commercial, self-referenced, turn-key frequency combs operated continuously in Heidelberg, Germany, over an urban landscape. The instrument allows to infer column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of CO2 along a 3.1 km absorption path. During routine observations within the evaluation period from September 2025 to February 2026 the system achieved a data coverage of 85 %, with losses primarily attributable to visibility-limiting weather conditions such as fog and heavy rain. The instrument precision, characterized by the overlapping Allan deviation under stable atmospheric conditions, reaches 4.79 ppm √s for CO2, equivalent to 0.28 ppm at five minutes averaging time. These values are on par with or better than previous open-path DCS experiments and represent roughly one order of magnitude improvement over a co-deployed open-path Fourier transform spectrometer operating on the same path. The two instruments differ by a small bias of 0.16 ppm for CO2. The results demonstrate that high-quality, long-term open-path DCS operation is achievable with readily available hardware, making the technique accessible to the broader atmospheric science community for applications ranging from urban-flux monitoring and network-scale observations to the validation of spectroscopic databases.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
