Characteristics of Extreme Snowfall–Wind-Gust Events in Finland (1960–2024): Frequency, Duration, and Intensity
Abstract. Compound weather events involving both strong wind gusts and intense snowfall can have significant impacts on critical infrastructure and public safety. This study analyses the frequency, duration, and intensity of such events in Finland using ERA5 reanalysis data for 1960–2024. Extreme wind gust and snowfall conditions were identified using spatially varying 95th and 98th percentile thresholds. Events with both snowfall and wind gust exceeding these thresholds simultaneously were classified as compound events (SWG). SWGs were most frequent along Finland’s south facing coastal regions and eastern Finland. Increasing the threshold from 95th to 98th reduced the number of SWGs but emphasized the dominance of coastal areas and highlighted more severe cases. Approximately half of the events were short-lived (20 m s˗1, hourly snowfall rates >2.5 mm h˗1, and total snowfall >20 mm. Although rare, these high-impact SWGs can create substantial operational challenges for energy production and other critical infrastructures. The results underscore the importance of incorporating compound-event analysis into hazard assessments and preparedness strategies for regions exposed to severe winter weather.
This paper was very well written and provides a clear and interesting assessment. I found as I read the manuscript that potential issues or shortcomings I had were eventually answered (i.e., comparison of the ERA5 variables to stations - which I am glad to see was done, and the comparison of wind/snow only events to SWGs, which was an interesting comparison I was going to suggest anyway). The authors acknowledge the shortcomings of ERA5 while showing why such a product is necessary for this type of assessment. I have made a few comments on some unclear sentences in the text which I suggest rewording for clarity, but otherwise I find this ready for publication. I have indicated I would be willing to review this paper, but I don't feel I will need to given the minor revisions I have suggested.
Comments: