Preprints
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5PR3B
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5PR3B
20 May 2026
 | 20 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

A hybrid physics–ML framework for integrating groundwater dynamics into land surface modeling

Chen Yang, Hui Huang, Zeyu Tang, Yongjiu Dai, and Xiaobin Chang

Abstract. Three-dimensional groundwater dynamics play a critical role in regulating land–atmosphere interactions, yet resolving three-dimensional subsurface flow processes at large scales remains computationally prohibitive. Here we present a hybrid coupling framework that enables the integration of three-dimensional groundwater processes into land surface modeling at substantially reduced computational cost. The framework replaces the physics-based groundwater solver with a deep learning surrogate while preserving the original coupling interface, providing a practical pathway for incorporating groundwater dynamics into Earth system simulations. A key feature of the framework is an error-control strategy based on a free-drainage lower bound, which approximates the treatment of subsurface processes in conventional land surface models where groundwater feedback is largely neglected. The hybrid solution is considered acceptable as long as its deviation remains within this free-drainage bound, with a user-defined threshold providing additional control over acceptable error levels, enabling flexible, application-dependent control of model fidelity. The framework is demonstrated in a ~34,000 km² watershed in the Pearl River Basin, China, achieving an approximately 20× speedup while maintaining strong agreement with the physics-based reference. Over a full-year hourly simulation, the median water table depth error is within 0.5 m and the domain-averaged latent heat flux reaches a Kling–Gupta efficiency of 0.965. This study demonstrates the feasibility of hybrid surrogate–physics coupling for representing groundwater processes and provides a flexible foundation for multi-timescale, on-demand simulations, with potential for extension to diverse hydroclimatic settings and integration into Earth system modeling frameworks.

Share
Chen Yang, Hui Huang, Zeyu Tang, Yongjiu Dai, and Xiaobin Chang

Status: open (until 16 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Chen Yang, Hui Huang, Zeyu Tang, Yongjiu Dai, and Xiaobin Chang
Chen Yang, Hui Huang, Zeyu Tang, Yongjiu Dai, and Xiaobin Chang

Viewed

Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.

Total article views: 127 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
127 0 0 127 0 0
  • HTML: 127
  • PDF: 0
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 127
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 May 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 May 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.

Total article views: 127 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 127 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Groundwater plays an important role in how water and energy move between land and atmosphere, but simulating it in detail is very slow. We developed a faster method that keeps the key processes while reducing computing cost. Tested in a large river basin in China, it ran about twenty times faster and still closely matched detailed simulations. This approach makes it easier to include groundwater in large-scale and long-term environmental modeling.
Share