Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2293
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2293
24 Jun 2026
 | 24 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

A mountain-generated mesoscale test case from DCMIP-2025: Gap flow and vortex shedding variants

Timothy C. Andrews, Christiane Jablonowski, Owen K. Hughes, and Thomas M. Bendall

Abstract. DCMIP-2025, the fourth instance of the Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP), introduced new test cases for the evaluation of dynamical cores for atmospheric General Circulation Models. This paper overviews one of these test cases focused on mesoscale dynamics generated by mountain orography, using simple initial conditions and varying surface profiles to produce nonlinear flows. This work investigates two orographies: a mountain chain that instigates a gap flow, and an isolated mountain which generates vortex shedding. These tests are used to compare four state-of-the-art dynamical cores: CAM-SE (spectral element), CAM-FV3 (finite volume cubed-sphere), and CAM-MPAS (Model for Prediction Across Scales) from NCAR's Community Atmosphere Model (CAM), along with GungHo, the dynamical core from the UK Met Office's new LFRic model. Simulation comparisons highlight the impact of model features such as the mesh and sources of numerical diffusion. This test, with its two variants, adds to the existing suite of cases that enable the rigorous examination and comparison of dynamical cores.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Timothy C. Andrews, Christiane Jablonowski, Owen K. Hughes, and Thomas M. Bendall

Status: open (until 19 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Timothy C. Andrews, Christiane Jablonowski, Owen K. Hughes, and Thomas M. Bendall
Timothy C. Andrews, Christiane Jablonowski, Owen K. Hughes, and Thomas M. Bendall
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 24 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
This work describes a new test case for evaluating and comparing models for numerical weather prediction, as part of the Dynamical Core Model Intercomparison Project (DCMIP). We present two versions of this test: First is gap flow through a mountain chain, and second is vortex shedding behind a mountain. We apply these tests to four numerical models, with different modelling decisions being reflected in the simulation comparisons.
Share