the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Trends in measured and modeled lower stratospheric Antarctic vortex ozone over the past two decades
Abstract. We analyze 2004 to 2023 winter/spring lower stratospheric Antarctic ozone data from the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS), along with similarly sampled profiles from two simulations from the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM) run with specified dynamics. One of these simulations uses fixed surface organic halogens from 1998 onward. The interannual variability in MLS vortex-average ozone is well matched by WACCM, although WACCM shows a smaller seasonal decrease. Probability density functions of vortex ozone profiles reveal slow increases in the smallest values; WACCM shows good agreement with MLS distribution shifts and simple linear trends. We also use multivariate linear regression with two periodic functions and a proxy for polar stratospheric clouds to derive trends in vortex-average ozone during September and October. Calculated trends are consistent with slow Antarctic vortex ozone recovery from the impact of ozone-depleting substances, with values between ~5 and 16 ppbv yr-1 in the 56–100 hPa layer. WACCM results agree well with those from MLS. The simulation with fixed surface organic halogens is consistent with zero trend. We also apply the Match technique, which follows MLS-observed parcels along trajectories to estimate vortex-average chemical ozone loss. Match estimates also show reductions in seasonal Antarctic ozone loss, although few of the Match results represent greater than two-sigma departures from zero. Our work confirms the emergence of ozone recovery, a key goal of the Aura mission, and underscores the importance of the 1987 Montreal Protocol and its Amendments in curtailing emissions of ozone-depleting substances.
- Preprint
(5988 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1701 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2273', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Jun 2026
- RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2273', Kris Wargan, 17 Jun 2026
- AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2273', Michael J. Schwartz, 31 Jul 2026
- AC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2273', Michael J. Schwartz, 31 Jul 2026
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2273', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Jun 2026
This manuscript is well-written. I have only minor comments on this.
- The paper should be better motivated, rather than saying MLS has long-term data and was devised to track ozone and associated chemistry from space. I agree this, but there are also MLS-led studies on the same topic, although for different time periods.
- The model and measurement differences have to be discussed by comparing with similar studies in the past. There are several CTM simulations and measurement comparisons. Please check whether your analysis is consistent or not in terms of the differences or chlorine activation.
- The slow deactivation is a known issue. ClO and HCl comparisons would show this. However, what about PSCs? Are these well represented in the model? How good is the PSC simulation in the model?
- Vortex edge definition and estimation are not clear. Please elaborate.
- Line 251: Is there any reason for this difference?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2273-RC1 - RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2273', Kris Wargan, 17 Jun 2026
- AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2273', Michael J. Schwartz, 31 Jul 2026
- AC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2273', Michael J. Schwartz, 31 Jul 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 370 | 230 | 38 | 638 | 32 | 29 | 37 |
- HTML: 370
- PDF: 230
- XML: 38
- Total: 638
- Supplement: 32
- BibTeX: 29
- EndNote: 37
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This manuscript is well-written. I have only minor comments on this.