Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-224
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-224
05 Mar 2026
 | 05 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Comparison of two oxidation flow reactors for measuring aged aerosol from passenger car exhaust

Katariina Kylämäki, Milja Jäppi, Leïla Simon, Wojciech Honkisz, Petteri Marjanen, Laura Salo, Teemu Lepistö, Henna Lintusaari, Luis Barreira, Hannu Kuutti, Matti Rissanen, Piotr Bielaczyc, Hilkka Timonen, Päivi Aakko-Saksa, and Topi Rönkkö

Abstract. Oxidation flow reactors (OFRs) are a practical way to assess the secondary aerosol (SecA) mass formation potential of any gas mixture of interest in relatively short processing timescales. In this study, two OFRs were assembled in parallel and used to investigate the photochemical aging and formation of secondary aerosol from exhaust emissions of seven passenger cars. The potential aerosol mass OFR (PAM-OFR) and the Dekati OFR (DOFR) have differences in reactor volume, wall material, residence time and ultraviolet (UV) wavelengths, but the particle number and mass size distributions measured after them were comparable when averaged over the transient driving cycle. The average secondary particle mass emission factor (EF) for all 34 cycles was 22.90 mg km-1 for the PAM-OFR and 15.77 mg km-1 for the DOFR. The fuel and exhaust after-treatment technology affected the difference between the PAM-OFR and the DOFR EFs. With gasoline cars, fast bursts of SecA formation during cold start and highway driving were captured more clearly by the DOFR, which led to DOFR EFs exceeding PAM-OFR EFs. However, with modern diesel cars, the CNG car or hybrid cars that all produced low fresh PM emissions, the SecA mass EFs were higher from the PAM-OFR than from the DOFR. OH exposure did not cause the differences in emission factors between the OFRs, because the OH exposure range was small. Background SecA formation from the PAM-OFR was visible in the particle size distributions of the cleanest cars, which was corrected for in the EF calculations. On average, the PAM-OFR produced more background particle mass (9.10 μg m-3) than the DOFR (0.36 μg m-3).

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Katariina Kylämäki, Milja Jäppi, Leïla Simon, Wojciech Honkisz, Petteri Marjanen, Laura Salo, Teemu Lepistö, Henna Lintusaari, Luis Barreira, Hannu Kuutti, Matti Rissanen, Piotr Bielaczyc, Hilkka Timonen, Päivi Aakko-Saksa, and Topi Rönkkö

Status: open (until 10 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Katariina Kylämäki, Milja Jäppi, Leïla Simon, Wojciech Honkisz, Petteri Marjanen, Laura Salo, Teemu Lepistö, Henna Lintusaari, Luis Barreira, Hannu Kuutti, Matti Rissanen, Piotr Bielaczyc, Hilkka Timonen, Päivi Aakko-Saksa, and Topi Rönkkö
Katariina Kylämäki, Milja Jäppi, Leïla Simon, Wojciech Honkisz, Petteri Marjanen, Laura Salo, Teemu Lepistö, Henna Lintusaari, Luis Barreira, Hannu Kuutti, Matti Rissanen, Piotr Bielaczyc, Hilkka Timonen, Päivi Aakko-Saksa, and Topi Rönkkö
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 05 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Oxidation flow reactors (OFRs) simulate atmospheric aging of e.g. anthropogenic emissions. In this study, we aged exhaust from passenger cars in two OFRs with different designs. On average, the OFRs produced comparable particle size distributions and emission factors. However, there were differences between the OFRs in secondary particle formation depending on the fuel and technology of the car and the differences were mostly explained by OFR design.
Share