the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development of a dual-polarization Zdr radar operator with ice-phase hydrometeor classification for variational assimilation systems (RadDualIceVar v1.0)
Abstract. A differential reflectivity (Zdr) observation operator incorporating ice-phase hydrometeor classification was developed to explicitly account for ice-phase hydrometeor contributions in the data assimilation. This proposed observation operator is then implemented within a three-dimensional variational (3DVAR) data assimilation framework for direct assimilating radar Zdr observations. Its performance was evaluated using both single-observation and cycling assimilation experiments for a typhoon case. Results from the single-observation test indicate that assimilating Zdr introduces additional microphysical constraints, leading to more effective adjustments of hydrometeor compared with reflectivity-only assimilation. In the cycling assimilation experiments, the combined reflectivity and Zdr (RFZDR) configuration produces a more physically consistent representation of reflectivity and Zdr, along with a more realistic vertical and horizontal distribution of hydrometeors. These improvements propagate into short-term precipitation forecasts, with RFZDR exhibiting lower root-mean-square errors, enhanced spatial consistency, and gains in heavy precipitation metrics.
- Preprint
(2988 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 21 Sep 2026)
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2230 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 08 Aug 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Liu Yi, 12 Aug 2026
reply
Dear Juan A. Añel,
Thank you for pointing out the issues regarding the GMD Code and Data Policy.
We have now archived the WRFDA code, FNL data, and radar data required for this study in Zenodo. The complete archive is available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21896503
We will also update the “Code and Data Availability” section and the corresponding references in the manuscript.
Please let us know if any further adjustments are needed.
Best regards,
Liu Yi
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2230-AC1 -
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 12 Aug 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Thanks for addressing this issue so quickly. I have checked the repositories and we can consider now the current version of your manuscript in compliance with the code policy of the journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2230-CEC2
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 12 Aug 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Liu Yi, 12 Aug 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83 | 24 | 16 | 123 | 14 | 15 |
- HTML: 83
- PDF: 24
- XML: 16
- Total: 123
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
First, in your manuscript you do not provide a repository for the WRF model used in your work. We can not accept this. The policy of the journal clearly establishes that all the code and data necessary to replicate a submitted work must be published in an open repository before submitting it, and adequately cited in the text, including URL and permanent handler (e.g. DOI).
In addition, you have archived the data used and produced in your work in sites that we can not accept (e.g. ucar.edu and cma.cn servers), as they do not fulfil GMD’s requirements for a persistent data archive because:
- They do not appear to have a published policy for data preservation over many years or decades (some flexibility exists over the precise length of preservation, but the policy must exist).
- They do not appear to have a published mechanism for preventing authors from unilaterally removing material. Archives must have a policy which makes removal of materials only possible in exceptional circumstances and subject to an independent curatorial decision,
- In the case of the cma.cn it does not appear to issue a persistent identifier such as a DOI or Handle for each precise dataset.
If we have missed a published policy which does in fact address this matter satisfactorily, please post a response linking to it. If you have any questions about this issue, please post them in a reply.
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, publish your code and data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy.
Later, if the Topical Editor decides to continue with the review or publication process of your manuscript and you are requested to upload a new version of it, then The 'Code and Data Availability’ section of your manuscript must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor