Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2225
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2225
04 May 2026
 | 04 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Intercomparison of nighttime aerosol optical depth retrievals from both reflectance-based and city light-based methods using VIIRS DNB data

Aanan H. Schlief, Jared W. Marquis, Jianglong Zhang, Jeffrey S. Reid, and Steve Miller

Abstract. Using observations from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Day/Night Band (DNB), two different nighttime aerosol optical depth (AOD) retrieval methods were evaluated and inter-compared. The first approach is a lunar reflectance-based retrieval method, using reflected moonlight in a manner similar to daytime retrievals. The second approach utilizes changes in light patterns over regions with artificial light sources due to the upward diffusion of light by aerosol particles. Both retrieval methods were implemented over Dakar, Senegal for 2017 and 2018. Retrievals from both approaches were evaluated against ground-based solar and lunar AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) data, as well as daytime AOD retrievals from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). Additionally, impacts of using the Miller and Turner lunar model for estimating Top-Of-Atmosphere (TOA) lunar spectral flux for AOD retrievals were also studied. Findings suggest that while both retrieval methods show skill in retrieving nighttime AOD by qualitatively identifying over-ocean aerosol plume locations and quantitatively comparing with solar and lunar retrieved AERONET data, cloud contamination and variations in lunar properties are factors that need to be carefully quantified in future studies for accurate nighttime aerosol retrievals using VIIRS DNB data. This study suggests that there are sampling issues from both approaches, but the combined use of both retrieval methods can increase the sampling rate for nighttime aerosol retrievals by more than 50 %.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Aanan H. Schlief, Jared W. Marquis, Jianglong Zhang, Jeffrey S. Reid, and Steve Miller

Status: open (until 09 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Aanan H. Schlief, Jared W. Marquis, Jianglong Zhang, Jeffrey S. Reid, and Steve Miller
Aanan H. Schlief, Jared W. Marquis, Jianglong Zhang, Jeffrey S. Reid, and Steve Miller
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Two methods for retrieving nighttime aerosol optical depth, with the first method using reflected moonlight and the second method using emissions from artificial lights were intercompared using the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Day-Night-Band data. This study indicates that both methods have skills in retrieving nighttime aerosol optical depth, and the combined use of both methods can improve data sampling rates.
Share