Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2206
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2206
04 May 2026
 | 04 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Hydrological implications of vegetation-associated precipitation recycling during peak growing season over the Loess Plateau

Jiaxiang Deng, Quan Quan, Shuangcheng Tang, Hanbo Yang, and Xiaoyu Song

Abstract. Vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau has led to continued debate over whether enhanced land–atmosphere coupling can meaningfully alleviate water scarcity in this water-limited region. In this study, we combined the WAM-2layers atmospheric moisture-tracking model with a random forest–enhanced Budyko framework and introduced a vegetation-weighted leaf area index (LAIw) to examine vegetation-associated precipitation recycling and its hydrological implications during the peak growing season (July–August) from 2000 to 2022. Precipitation over the Loess Plateau is dominated by land-sourced moisture, which accounts for 86.5 % of total precipitation. Internal moisture recycling contributes 14.4 % of total precipitation and shows a declining trend of −0.073 mm yr−1. Surface water availability also declines significantly, at a rate of −0.34 mm yr−1, mainly because evapotranspiration increases by 0.31 mm yr−1. At the regional mean scale, vegetation-associated recycled precipitation makes only a limited contribution to precipitation, evapotranspiration, and surface water availability, accounting for 0.059 %, 0.02 %, and 0.107 %, respectively. This low net contribution partly reflects the fact that internal moisture recycling itself represents only a limited fraction of total precipitation, and that positive and negative vegetation-associated effects partly offset each other. However, the hydrological effect varies clearly along the LAIw gradient, with weak positive contributions under low vegetation density and increasingly negative contributions under high vegetation density. These findings suggest that under water-limited conditions, enhanced vegetation–atmosphere coupling does not necessarily lead to meaningful gains in surface water availability. This seasonal focus is intended to capture the period of strongest vegetation–atmosphere coupling rather than the full annual water balance.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jiaxiang Deng, Quan Quan, Shuangcheng Tang, Hanbo Yang, and Xiaoyu Song

Status: open (until 15 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jiaxiang Deng, Quan Quan, Shuangcheng Tang, Hanbo Yang, and Xiaoyu Song
Jiaxiang Deng, Quan Quan, Shuangcheng Tang, Hanbo Yang, and Xiaoyu Song
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 May 2026
Download
Short summary
This study asks whether planting more vegetation on the Loess Plateau can bring enough extra rain to ease water shortages. By combining rainfall tracking with water balance analysis, we found that the added rain linked to vegetation is generally too small to make up for the extra water used by plant growth. Benefits are limited in sparsely vegetated areas and can turn negative where vegetation is dense, showing that restoration in dry regions has clear water limits.
Share