Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2178
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2178
21 Jul 2026
 | 21 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Examining anthropogenic CO2 emission inventories over the Greater Tokyo Area using in situ observations and high-resolution atmospheric simulation

Zhenglun Yang, Yukio Terao, Thomas Lauvaux, Tomohiro Oda, Charbel Abdallah, Masahide Nishihashi, Makoto Saito, Hirofumi Ohyama, Shigeyuki Ishidoya, Hirofumi Sugawara, Toshinobu Machida, Motoki Sasakawa, and Yasunori Tohjima

Abstract. Cities are major sources of greenhouse gas emissions, and combining activity-based inventories with atmospheric constraints can support science-based mitigation at subnational levels. We implement high-resolution WRF-Chem simulations over the Greater Tokyo Area (GTA) using five anthropogenic emission inventories (MOSAIC, ODIAC, EDGAR, CAMS-GLOB-ANT, and GCP-GridFED) and examine CO2 concentrations at four sites. Using observations from the summit of Mt. Fuji as a background reference, we derive GTA CO2 enhancements (ΔCO2). The simulations reproduce most observed ΔCO2 variability and the relationship between elevated ΔCO2 and transport from the urban core and the Tokyo Bay, while showing differences in ΔCO2 amplitudes due to five inventories. The four observation sites represent different GTA subregions, providing complementary constraints on inventory spatial patterns and highlighting the importance of site selection in urban assessments. High simulated ΔCO2 at Tsukuba is largely attributable to stronger northern suburban emissions in MOSAIC and ODIAC, whereas high ΔCO2 at Yoyogi in ODIAC and GridFED is attributable to stronger nearby urban-core emissions. CAMS-GLOB-ANT and GridFED overestimate ΔCO2 at Yokosuka because of large emissions along the Tokyo Bay. EDGAR shows the lowest bias, although its spatial distribution is coarse and diffuse compared with MOSAIC and ODIAC. Anthropogenic CO2 is best reproduced by EDGAR and MOSAIC, though this result is strongly influenced by Yoyogi. Corrected total GTA CO2 emissions of inventories range from 60.2 to 81.1 Tg C yr−1. These results show where inventories diverge within a megacity and provide a practical benchmark for improving urban CO2 inventories and future urban emission monitoring.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Zhenglun Yang, Yukio Terao, Thomas Lauvaux, Tomohiro Oda, Charbel Abdallah, Masahide Nishihashi, Makoto Saito, Hirofumi Ohyama, Shigeyuki Ishidoya, Hirofumi Sugawara, Toshinobu Machida, Motoki Sasakawa, and Yasunori Tohjima

Status: open (until 01 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Zhenglun Yang, Yukio Terao, Thomas Lauvaux, Tomohiro Oda, Charbel Abdallah, Masahide Nishihashi, Makoto Saito, Hirofumi Ohyama, Shigeyuki Ishidoya, Hirofumi Sugawara, Toshinobu Machida, Motoki Sasakawa, and Yasunori Tohjima
Zhenglun Yang, Yukio Terao, Thomas Lauvaux, Tomohiro Oda, Charbel Abdallah, Masahide Nishihashi, Makoto Saito, Hirofumi Ohyama, Shigeyuki Ishidoya, Hirofumi Sugawara, Toshinobu Machida, Motoki Sasakawa, and Yasunori Tohjima
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 21 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary

Cities need accurate emission estimates for climate action. We compared five emission inventories over the Greater Tokyo Area using measurements from four sites and an atmospheric transport model. We found that measurements at the four sites show distinct features of the inventories in emission amount and spatial distribution. Site choice is important for evaluating urban emissions. These findings can help improve emission inventories, future urban observations and simulations.

Share