Long-Lived High-Frequency Gravity Waves over the Southern Ocean and the East Antarctic coastline and Their Influence on Cloud Properties
Abstract. The Southern Ocean near the East Antarctic coast is a dynamic source of gravity waves, yet long-lived high-frequency gravity waves (HFGWs) remain poorly documented. Using four months of ship-based remote sensing and in-situ observations, this study analyses the characteristics of HFGWs and their influence on cloud properties near three Antarctic coastal stations (Davis, Casey, and Mawson) through statistical analyses and detailed case studies. Doppler vertical velocity oscillations are observed in clouds with tops around 8 km, with amplitudes mainly near 0.02 m s-1. These clouds are primarily ice. Based on radiosonde ascent rates and Richardson number analysis, the oscillations are identified as gravity waves. The observed gravity waves typically exhibit periods close to the buoyancy period (about 10 minutes) and horizontal wavelengths of 3 km, and can be tracked for up to 48 hours (approximately 220–320 wave cycles). Approximately 46 % of valid Doppler velocity data within clouds exhibited high-frequency oscillations associated with HFGWs. These occurrences covered 91 % of cloudy days, indicating that such waves are ubiquitous. Periodic variations in reflectivity further suggest that these waves modulate cloud properties. Potential sources of the HFGWs are investigated using air-mass trajectories, ERA5 reanalysis, and MODIS observations. The waves are most likely generated by multiple sources including cyclonic activity, katabatic winds, and jet-related synoptic forcing. In some cases a thermal duct, together with a concurrent low-frequency gravity wave background, provides a multiscale environment that likely supports the HFGWs long-lived nature.
This study investigates the relationship between high-frequency gravity waves (HFGW) and cloud properties using shipborne observations obtained by Australian Aurora Australis during an Antarctic voyage from austral spring to summer in 2017/2018. The authors focus on gravity-wave events observed near three Australian Antarctic stations (Davis, Casey and Mawson) during the voyage. During these events, ice clouds were dominant in the middle and upper troposphere. In additional, to examine the possible causes of the HFGW, the authors analyzed their relationship with synoptic-scale disturbances using reanalysis data and performed back-trajectory analyses. I recommend that the manuscript be reconsidered after major revision. My main concerns are outlined below.
Major points:
References:
Minor points:
Lines 30: 2017, 2016 > 2016, 2017
Line 61: RSV is Research Vessel? The term ‘RSV’ should be written out in full at first use.
Line 205: In Fig. 3 (a) and (b) > In Figs. 3 (a) and (b)
Lines 210-211: Figs. 2 (e) and (f) > Figures 2 (e) and (f)
Line 212: UT > UTC
Line 224: Figs. 5(a) and (b) > Figures 5(a) and (b)
Line 228: Figs. 5(b) > Figure 5(b)
Line 230: Figs. 5(e) and (h) > in Figs. 5(e) and (h)
Line 231: Figs. 5(f) > Fig. 5(f)
Line 298: Figure 11(a) and (d) illustrates > Figures 11(a) and (d) illustrate
Caption of Figure 2: from 05:00 UTC to 15:00 UTC > from 04:00 UTC to 18:00 UTC
Caption of Figure 4: 2027 > 2017
Caption of Figure 13: from 16:00 to 00:00 UTC on 29 December > from 16:00 UTC on 29 December 2017 to 00:00 UTC on 30 December 2017