the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The sensitivity of ground-level ozone to precursor emissions and source contributions in Southeast Asia
Abstract. To mitigate the surface ozone (O3) pollution in Southeast Asia, a full understanding of the processes and contributions of precursor emissions [i.e., volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx)] to O3 is required but remains unclear. This study applied an adjoint sensitivity model to evaluate the source-receptor (S-R) relationship between O3 and the precursors, as well as the source contributions over different receptor regions in Southeast Asia. The process analysis was performed to further characterize O3 formation. We found a predominant NOx-limited O3 formation regime across Southeast Asia due to substantial regional biogenic VOC emissions, with exceptions in areas where anthropogenic NOx emissions were significant, such as Singapore, Jakarta, Bangkok, and the Malacca Straits. NOx was identified as the primary contributor to the surface O3, whereas VOCs contributed positively to VOC-limited regions but negatively to NOx-limited areas. Additionally, regional and super-regional transboundary air pollution accounted for 56–98 % of surface O3 concentration across Southeast Asian countries. The findings highlighted the need for differentiated O3 mitigation strategies in Southeast Asia, combining coordinated regional NOx emission reductions with targeted VOC controls in the VOC-limited urban areas.
- Preprint
(4870 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(16571 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 19 Jun 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2148', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 May 2026 reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 276 | 49 | 8 | 333 | 41 | 25 | 21 |
- HTML: 276
- PDF: 49
- XML: 8
- Total: 333
- Supplement: 41
- BibTeX: 25
- EndNote: 21
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This study analyzed the ozone sensitivity in Southeast Asia using the 3-D chemical transport model. The topic looks timely associated with the issue of recently high ozone enhancement in Asia. Whole research looks sincerely conducted, therefore this submitted manuscript is informative. I think that this work will be useful to the air quality community.
However, I have some questions about the quality of model results. If the quality of model is not guaranteed, we cannot use this work as the important scientific lesson. Please reply to my questions below. With authors' response, I will assess the meaning and value of results in this manuscript.
1) Please explain the meaning of Figure S10 more, which shows the surface ozone comparison between real observation data and authors' CMAQ model simulation. I am not clear if the model result is acceptable. Although correlation coefficients are from 0.5 to 0.6 (which may be not so bad), the variance (RMSE) of scatter-plot looks to large to me. If this modeling result is reliable, please explain it compared with similar test results from previous references.
2) Is there any result about the evaluation of modeling CH2O and NO2?
Since simulated ground-level CH2O/NO2 is used in this study (e.g., Figure S16), the validation of CMAQ CH2O and NO2 looks necessary related to the reliablity to detect NOx- or VOC-limited regions.
3) Can we trust the CMAQ simulation results in the free troposphere? I am not sure the analysis quality of vertical distribution using CMAQ modeling data. Some clues should be suggested for guaranteeing the quality of free-tropospheric simulation (Also, please include the vertical layer height information name in Figure S19).
4) Authors showed the surface ozone distribution in Figures 1, S35 and S36. Based on these figures, the ozone production seems very high following the ship track. Is it right? In Figure S16, there are some yellow dots over the ocean, indicating the 'transition' region. Is it due to the high enhancement of NOx production over the ship track? Can we say that the ship plume is very significant for ozone production and decision of chemical regimes (VOC or NOX limited regime)? If yes, it is curious to me, because some previous studies show that the ozone level is higher over the sea (which is very rural area). When we compare the ozone level between the megacity and rural maritime area, ozone is usually lower in the megacity due to the ozone titration by high NOx level. If NOx emission from ship plumes matter, I guess that we can see the similar 'ozone titration' over the ship track, instead of ozone enhancement. Is it qualified for authors' CMAQ ozone simulation over the ocean?
5) Please explain more in detail about the calculation of Integrated Process Rate (IPR) at the surface level. I am not very clear about its definition and the way to get this value in this study.
6) In Figure 3 and 4, ozone sensitivity to NOx and VOC is higher in the East of land area (It is very clear for the Philippines). Why this happens? Is it because polluted plume is moving from land to ocean? If yes, I do not understand why polluted plume is moving to the east (seems affected by the westerly), because the tropical region (zero to ~30 northern latitude) is usually affected by the 'trade wind', which is generally northern easterly. If monsoon effect is stronger, then the wind pattern can be different from typical trade wind pattern. Could you explain more about this question?
7) Please include the axis name in Figure S7.