Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2113
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2113
23 Apr 2026
 | 23 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Seaweed and coastal plant biomass-stimulated methane emissions driven by methylated compound content

Ning Hall, Leith Murray, Sophie Golding-Chan, Riley Herron, Wei Wen Wong, Katherine J. Jeppe, Christopher Barlow, Chris Greening, and Perran L. M. Cook

Abstract. Methane emissions from coastal sediments are increasingly influenced by ecological change, including eutrophication-driven seaweed blooms and efforts to restore coastal vegetation. Yet the pathways and variability of methane production in these environments remain poorly constrained. Here, we compared methane production from three seaweeds (Ulva, red filamentous algae, and kelp) and three coastal plants (mangrove leaves, saltmarsh plants, and seagrass) in sands from Port Phillip Bay, Australia. To identify potential predictive precursors, we quantified key methylated osmolytes (dimethyl sulfoniopropionate (DMSP), choline, trimethylamine (TMA), trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO)), that serve as methanogenic substrates. Methane production from seaweeds was strongly correlated with osmolyte content, whereas coastal plants, particularly mangrove leaves, stimulated methane production despite low osmolyte levels, likely via decomposition pathways generating methanol. These findings broaden the understanding of organic matter sources fueling methanogenesis in coastal sediments and highlight an overlooked contribution of both seaweeds and plants to coastal methane cycling.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Biogeosciences.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ning Hall, Leith Murray, Sophie Golding-Chan, Riley Herron, Wei Wen Wong, Katherine J. Jeppe, Christopher Barlow, Chris Greening, and Perran L. M. Cook

Status: open (until 04 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ning Hall, Leith Murray, Sophie Golding-Chan, Riley Herron, Wei Wen Wong, Katherine J. Jeppe, Christopher Barlow, Chris Greening, and Perran L. M. Cook
Ning Hall, Leith Murray, Sophie Golding-Chan, Riley Herron, Wei Wen Wong, Katherine J. Jeppe, Christopher Barlow, Chris Greening, and Perran L. M. Cook
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 23 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
We analysed the chemical compounds most readily available to methane producing bacteria, as well as methane production from these seaweeds and plants. We find that seaweed methane emission potential is strongly related to these compounds, but coastal plants are not, providing a starting point for differentiating and predicting the effects on methane emissions of ongoing changes to coastal ecosystem vegetation caused ocean warming, eutrophication, and ecosystem restoration efforts.
Share