Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2073
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2073
23 Apr 2026
 | 23 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Volatile organic compounds and their role in secondary aerosol chemistry in a cold and dark urban environment

James R. Campbell, Brice Temime-Roussel, Barbara D'Anna, Kathy S. Law, Weihang Zhang, Rodney J. Weber, Michael Battaglia Jr., Kayane K. Dingilian, Meeta Cesler-Maloney, Jason M. St. Clair, and Jingqiu Mao

Abstract. Wintertime PM2.5 pollution is a longstanding issue in the urban subarctic environment such as Fairbanks, Alaska. While previous studies suggest that aldehydes may serve as precursors of S(IV) species in aerosols, the role of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions in secondary aerosol chemistry remains poorly understood. Here, we use measurements from an online proton transfer reaction time of flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS), combined with complementary gas and aerosol measurements from the the Alaskan Layered Pollution and Chemical Analysis (ALPACA) field campaign in 2022, to examine VOC sources and their roles in aerosol chemistry in downtown Fairbanks. We find that alcohols, aromatics and carbonyls together account for ~70% of measured VOCs, with methanol, ethanol, formaldehyde, benzene and toluene as dominant species. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis indicate that approximately 56% of VOCs are associated with vehicle emissions, while wood heating and heating oil together contribute about 14%. Formaldehyde is primarily linked to diesel emissions, as well as primary and secondary sources associated with aged air masses. By comparing PMF factors with measured PM2.5 S(IV) species, we find that vehicle-related emissions of ammonia and formaldehyde likely play a key role in the formation of hydroxymethanesulfonate (HMS) in Fairbanks.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
James R. Campbell, Brice Temime-Roussel, Barbara D'Anna, Kathy S. Law, Weihang Zhang, Rodney J. Weber, Michael Battaglia Jr., Kayane K. Dingilian, Meeta Cesler-Maloney, Jason M. St. Clair, and Jingqiu Mao

Status: open (until 04 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
James R. Campbell, Brice Temime-Roussel, Barbara D'Anna, Kathy S. Law, Weihang Zhang, Rodney J. Weber, Michael Battaglia Jr., Kayane K. Dingilian, Meeta Cesler-Maloney, Jason M. St. Clair, and Jingqiu Mao
James R. Campbell, Brice Temime-Roussel, Barbara D'Anna, Kathy S. Law, Weihang Zhang, Rodney J. Weber, Michael Battaglia Jr., Kayane K. Dingilian, Meeta Cesler-Maloney, Jason M. St. Clair, and Jingqiu Mao
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 23 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Fairbanks, Alaska experiences episodes of high concentrations of PM2.5 pollution in the wintertime. The sources and mixing ratios of gas-phase pollution, and the extent to which it affects the formation of PM2.5, are not well understood. Here, we examine the sources of gas-phase species measured in wintertime Fairbanks. We compare these results with other PM2.5 measurements to determine how various sources can affect the formation of PM2.5 pollution.
Share