Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2063
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2063
22 Apr 2026
 | 22 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Impact of High-Volume GNSS Radio Occultation Data on the Navy's Global Numerical Weather Prediction

Hui W. Christophersen, Benjamin Ruston, and Dan Tyndall

Abstract. This study assesses the impact of assimilating high-volume Radio Occultation (RO) data from the RO modeling experiment (ROMEX) on the Navy's global operational Naval Global Environment Model (NAVGEM). A series of observation system experiments were conducted, including a control run, a standard assimilation of all ROMEX data, and two sensitivity tests: one with an empirical bias correction and another with a modified refractivity coefficient. Results indicate that while the standard assimilation of ROMEX data improved free-tropospheric moisture forecasts, it amplified existing model biases in temperature and geopotential height, leading to forecast degradation. In contrast, both sensitivity experiments led to substantial improvements in forecast skill. The empirical bias correction method proved most effective, yielding consistent forecast improvements across temperature, moisture, and geopotential height. A Forecast Sensitivity to Observation Impact (FSOI) analysis confirmed the positive contribution of all ROMEX missions, with Spire missions providing the largest total impact and COSMIC-2 showing the highest per-observation effectiveness. The findings underscore that an adjustment to the current treatment of the observation was critical to fully realize the benefits of the large volume of RO observations. While the empirical bias correction delivers the greatest forecast improvements, it may obscure and reinforce persistent model biases. The refractivity coefficient adjustment offers an alternative that preserves the unbiased nature of RO observations.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors serves as editor for the special issue to which this paper belongs.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Hui W. Christophersen, Benjamin Ruston, and Dan Tyndall

Status: open (until 28 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Hui W. Christophersen, Benjamin Ruston, and Dan Tyndall
Hui W. Christophersen, Benjamin Ruston, and Dan Tyndall
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 22 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
This study examined whether adding large volumes of satellite-based atmospheric data can improve weather forecasts in a Navy model. Using a series of controlled experiments, we tested different ways of incorporating the data. Simply adding it introduced biases, but adjusting how the data were used led to clear improvements. All missions contributed positively, with Spire providing the largest total benefit and COSMIC-2 the highest impact per observation.
Share