the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Ultraviolet observations of the Earth and Moon during the JUICE Lunar-Earth flyby
Abstract. During the JUICE Lunar-Earth Gravity Assist (LEGA) period in August 2024, the JUICE ultraviolet imaging spectrograph (JUICE-UVS) performed a series of observations of the Earth and Moon, detecting reflected sunlight at the Moon and emissions of atmospheric species including hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen at the Earth. These observations provided the first opportunity for in-flight calibration of the instrument response to extended planetary targets. They were used to refine the wavelength calibration across the full instrument bandpass, confirm accurate knowledge of the pointing of the UVS field-of-view relative to the spacecraft, and validate previous measurements of the UV effective area determined from observations of UV-bright stars. The observations performed also demonstrate the range of scientific analyses to be performed during the science phase of the mission and are useful for the development and testing of relevant mapping tools and procedures. The JUICE-UVS LEGA data confirm that the instrument is in good health and well suited to its goals of characterizing the surfaces and atmospheres of Jupiter’s icy moons, mapping and monitoring Jupiter’s aurora and upper atmosphere, and studying the Jupiter-Io connection.
- Preprint
(9895 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2038', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 May 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2038', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Jun 2026
Referee comments on Ann. Geo. paper:"Ultraviolet observations of the Earth and Moon during the JUICE Lunar-Earth flyby"
by Philippa Molyneux et al.
Overall this is a very good paper worthy of publication in Ann. Geo. This paper reports the capabilities and scientific data from the JUICE-UVS instrument in its fly-bys of the Moon and the Earth (LEGA), and as such is appropriate for publication in Ann. Geo. A few comments are given below but the paper is in good shape as is.
- The description of the instrument and the observations is clear and well written. No comments on this part.
- Thanks to the authors for including brightness values for the emission lines from the Earth. However, the comparison values from Meier 1991 are out of date, since they are not for a similar level of solar activity and based on early uncertain measurements with large uncertainties. The Meier 1304 daytime values are known to be unrealistically high. More recent observations by missions such as TWINS, PROCYON/LAICA, and GUVI would give more appropriate comparisons. In addition, for reference recent observations of the H Lyman-alpha emission from the Earth's dayside have shown brightnesses of 50-60 kR, compared with an apparent measurement of ~ 20 kR in this paper (Fig. 10). The recent data are roughly consistent with brightness values near solar max. reported from the STP-78 mission (Chakrabarti et al., JGR, 88, 4898-4904 (1983)). They found a total (looking up + looking down from 600 km) of 12-13 kR for OI 1304 A and 57 kR for H 1216 A during a period of high solar activity. These total columns correspond to what a distant mission would observe looking down into the sunlit atmosphere. I do recommend that Figure 10 at least be changed to compare with some other measurement than Meier 1991, and that the authors consider comparing to a different data set for both Lyman-alpha and OI 1304 brightnesses.
- The observations of the Moon are a different case, since the lunar albedo is fairly well measured but there is a phase effect that has to be taken into account (the brightness increases sharply close to a line of sight normal to the surface - the "opposition surge"). I am not familiar with the Lommel-Seeliger function but this must be intended to take into account the known phase effect. It appears that the reported observations where at a sufficient angle that this effect might not apply. The comparison with LAMP spectra gives confidence in the absolute calibration of the instrument, or at least consistency with another instrument.
- The description of planned observations at Jupiter is interesting and clearly worded.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2038-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 158 | 184 | 18 | 360 | 15 | 13 |
- HTML: 158
- PDF: 184
- XML: 18
- Total: 360
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Review of "Ultraviolet observations of the Earth and Moon during the JUICE Lunar-Earth flyby"
This article presents JUICE LEGA observations of the Moon and Earth and characterizes the calibration and instrument response. The manuscript is well written, clear, and complete. The figures adequately support the text, and the conclusions appropriately summarize the work. With minor revisions outlined below, this paper deserves publication in this journal.
Lines 22-27: What is meant by “first ever”? Is this the first time JUICE flew by the Earth and Moon, or the first time any spacecraft has flown by both objects?
Figure 1: Is it possible to include a higher resolution version of this image?
Line 81: Please define UVS NECP
Lines 82-83: Please include a brief justification explaining why the active area of the detector is a small fraction of the available space
Figure 2: There is brightening that is visible at the edges of the detector spectral area. This is most evident at the rightmost edge of the AP histogram. Is this a detector effect?
Lines 98-99: Helium is given in nm, but the figures are all given in spectral bins/pixels. Please include a pixel that corresponds to 58.4, similar to what is done with H I Lyman alpha in the previous line.
Line 202: Please explain what is meant by “extensive and intense”.
Figure 11: Interestingly, HD26793 and HD25330 are not visible in the Lyman alpha panel at all!
Line 418: A placeholder DOI is included – please ensure the data is published at the time of publication