Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2013
18 May 2026
 | 18 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Quantifying charger-related uncertainty in electrical mobility analysis of aerosols with MPSS-UQ 1.0

Matti Niskanen, Aku Ursin, Arttu Ylisirniö, and Kari E. J. Lehtinen

Abstract. Charging probability is the greatest source of uncertainty in electrical mobility-based measurements of aerosol size distributions, but its influence on the results is rarely quantified and reported. In bipolar charging, the charge distribution is almost universally modeled using the Wiedensohler approximation, although it has been shown to deviate significantly from the true charge distribution under many measurement conditions. The charge distribution depends, among other factors, on the mobilities of the charger ions, which are typically not precisely known. Ignoring this uncertainty can lead to biased size distribution estimates and severe underestimation of their uncertainty. In this work, we quantify the uncertainty that imprecisely known charger ion mobilities introduce into the charged particle fractions, and then propagate this uncertainty into the estimates of the particle size distributions using a modular Bayesian approach, in which the ion mobilities are treated as nuisance parameters and marginalized over their plausible range. The inversion method, which is available as the open-source Python package MPSS-UQ, is implemented with particular emphasis on computational efficiency and tested with both synthetic and real mobility particle size spectrometer data. For a month-long field dataset, marginalizing over the uncertain ion mobilities widened the posterior credible intervals of the estimated size distributions on average by a factor of 2.4, with factors up to 10 in some size classes, compared to conditioning on fixed mobility values. The wider intervals provide a more realistic assessment of uncertainties in the inferred size distributions, and quantifying the structure of this uncertainty helps identify where improvements in the characterization of charger ion properties or in the measurement setup would be most effective.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Matti Niskanen, Aku Ursin, Arttu Ylisirniö, and Kari E. J. Lehtinen

Status: open (until 14 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Matti Niskanen, Aku Ursin, Arttu Ylisirniö, and Kari E. J. Lehtinen
Matti Niskanen, Aku Ursin, Arttu Ylisirniö, and Kari E. J. Lehtinen
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 19 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Measuring tiny airborne particles by their movement in an electric field is common in atmospheric science, but the results almost never include uncertainty estimates. The largest source of uncertainty in these measurements relates to particle charging. We developed a Bayesian method to systematically quantify this uncertainty. Applied to a month of atmospheric data, accounting for charging uncertainty widened the plausible range of particle concentrations by a factor of two to ten.
Share