the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Twin Eyes in the Sky: Deep Learning-Based AOD Enhancement Using GOES-East and GOES-West
Abstract. High spatio-temporal resolution aerosol monitoring is critical to understand and mitigate air pollution and climate change. In this context, geostationary satellite instruments can be extremely beneficial, allowing fine-grained temporal characterization of aerosols over large regions. In this study, we combine data from the geostationary instruments Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) on-board GOES-East and GOES-West, using Deep Learning methods to post-process NASA Dark Target ABI AOD and NOAA ABI AOD products and improve their accuracy and spatial resolution. We deploy a Transformer Encoder architecture, and compare it to a Multi Layer Perceptron (MLP) architecture predicting at single time step, showing how exploiting the temporal patterns in geostationary daily observations leads to improved accuracy and generalization in the post-process correction. Additionally, we show that further improvement can be obtained combining multi-view angles from different (though very similar) geostationary satellites. Our region of interest is the Contiguous United States (CONUS) in the years 2020–2022.
- Preprint
(4890 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1987', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-1987/egusphere-2026-1987-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-1987-RC1 -
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Sep 2026
The manuscript presents a framework for improving geostationary satellite AOD products using deep learning, particularly by integrating GOES-16/17 observations and exploiting temporal information through a Transformer-based model. The study is potentially valuable for high-frequency aerosol monitoring and demonstrates the potential of deep learning approaches for satellite aerosol product improvement. However, several aspects require further clarification to better establish the scientific contribution and broader implications of the study.
- The contribution of the manuscript appears to be primarily an application of advanced deep learning architectures for AOD post-processing. The authors should better clarify the specific scientific limitations of existing GOES ABI AOD retrieval algorithms that the proposed framework aims to address. In particular, it remains unclear whether the model mainly corrects uncertainties associated with surface reflectance estimation, aerosol model assumptions, cloud contamination, viewing geometry effects, or temporal sampling limitations. Furthermore, the authors should provide additional analysis of what physical relationships or aerosol-related factors are learned by the network, in order to improve the interpretability of the deep learning approach and demonstrate its scientific relevance beyond improvements in statistical metrics.
- The manuscript claims improvements in both AOD accuracy and spatial resolution; however, the nature of the spatial enhancement requires further clarification. The NOAA ABI AOD product has a native spatial resolution of 2 km, while the NASA Dark Target ABI AOD product is provided at 10 km resolution with 10 km aggregation. In contrast, the proposed models operate on a 500 m grid. It is therefore unclear whether the output represents a genuine downscaled AOD product containing new sub-pixel spatial information, or whether it is primarily a bias-corrected post-processing product mapped onto a finer grid. The authors should clarify how the 500 m spatial variability is introduced, what additional information enables the model to provide finer-scale AOD estimates, and whether the resulting products should be interpreted as downscaled retrievals or resolution-enhanced corrections.
- More information is needed regarding the distribution of training and testing samples, as AOD observations are typically highly imbalanced, with a large number of low-AOD cases and relatively fewer high-AOD events. Such imbalance may affect model training and limit the ability of the model to generalize under extreme aerosol conditions. The authors should report the AOD distribution of the datasets, the number of samples across different aerosol loading ranges, and the model performance under different AOD conditions. This analysis is particularly important because the manuscript reports underestimation at high AOD levels, which may be related to insufficient representation of high-aerosol events in the training data.
- The manuscript concludes that exploiting temporal correlations through the Transformer architecture improves AOD retrieval accuracy; however, the benefits of temporal information may depend on aerosol variability. The authors should further evaluate the model performance during rapidly changing aerosol events, such as dust outbreaks, wildfire smoke episodes, and severe pollution events, where aerosol loading can change substantially over short time periods. Such analysis would help determine whether the temporal learning capability of the Transformer provides robust improvements under dynamic atmospheric conditions or whether it relies primarily on relatively stable aerosol temporal patterns.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1987-RC2
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Sep 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 152 | 62 | 37 | 251 | 26 | 22 |
- HTML: 152
- PDF: 62
- XML: 37
- Total: 251
- BibTeX: 26
- EndNote: 22
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1