A fast vegetation temperature condition index for operational agricultural drought monitoring at scale
Abstract. Agricultural adaptation to a changing climate requires frequent, accessible, and reliable information on water availability at spatio-temporal scales relevant to end users. In response to this need, we have developed an approach that evaluates agricultural drought conditions while minimising data and processing costs. This is achieved through an approximation of the land surface temperature–vegetation index (LST-VI) population, which is used in the calculation of the vegetation temperature condition index (VTCI), and the implementation of non-linear edge finding, which more accurately defines the warm and cold boundaries of the population. This 'fast' approach to defining the LST-VI population equally applies to similar vegetation-temperature-based approaches to drought monitoring and is critical to enabling such approaches to be used with higher resolution thermal datasets at scale due to the reduction in run-time and memory requirements it enables. We tested the approach in Taranaki, New Zealand, using the full Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) LST and surface reflectance record available through Google Earth Engine. We assessed three vegetation indices and evaluated fast-VTCI outputs against data from 10 ground-based soil moisture monitoring stations. Statistically significant correlations (Pearson’s and Spearman’s R=0.21–0.88, p<0.01) demonstrate that fast‑VTCI reliably captures spatial and temporal variability in field conditions, achieving performance equivalent to the traditional VTCI method. The strength of the observed correlations varies spatially and temporally for both indices. Overall, fast-VTCI substantially lowers computational costs, enabling efficient, operational drought monitoring across regional to national scales with spatial resolutions that support informed agricultural decision-making.
General comments
The manuscript presents fast VTCI, which replaces the full multi-year LST-VI population with a few summary pairs per scene and fits nonlinear edges with SVR.The objective is sound, operational drought monitoring is important and timely, and in situ record and open code are genuine strengths. The novelty, however, is incremental. Multi-year LST-VI populations, rules-based edge filtering, and nonlinear or machine-learning edges are all established. In addition, main concern is that the manuscript does not yet demonstrate that this proxy is as accurate as VTCI. The validation design cannot distinguish between edge sets, and the operationalization argument rests on MODIS, a sensor near the end of its life (already some incosistencies in data were observed that can affect the last years in the time series). Based on this, I recommend major revisions.
Specific comments
Data and Preprocessing:
Minor point: Fig. 1 uses ESA WorldCover while the methods use CGLS-LC100.
Methods
Discussion
Minor: Figure 4 seems blurred, should be replaced by higher quality visualization.