| 14 Apr 2026
Shelf Bathymetric Roughness Controls Mixing of the Persian/Arabian Gulf Outflow and Arabian Sea OMZ Ventilation
Abstract. Hypersaline overflows from Marginal seas contribute to global ocean circulation and climate variability. The Persian/Arabian Gulf (P/AG) contributes dense, saline, oxygenated deep outflow into the Arabian Sea’s Oxygen Minimum Zone (OMZ). Here, we present high-resolution hydrographic mapping of the UAE-Oman margin in the northwestern Arabian Sea, integrating CTD profiles, multibeam bathymetry and ROV imagery. The P/AG outflow forms a thin bottom-attached layer that thickens dramatically over the rough, irregular seafloor of the unstable shelf, where dilution and loss of bottom contact occur. Near-bottom salinity, oxygen, and pH decrease systematically downstream in association with enhanced mixing. Distinct benthic assemblages coincide with attached versus detached flow sectors, consistent with differing near-bed hydrodynamic regimes. These observations indicate that bathymetric roughness controls the near-field transformation of the outflow. Because outflow density depends on Gulf warming and evaporation, modest climatic shifts may alter detachment depth, pathway geometry, and intermediate-depth ventilation of the Arabian Sea OMZ.
Title: Shelf Bathymetric Roughness Controls Mixing of the Persian/Arabian Gulf Outflow and Arabian Sea OMZ Ventilation Author(s): Iteration: Initial submission
The manuscript is based on a dataset of 50 CTD casts collected recently in July 2025. The major result is presented in Figure 2, which nicely illustrates the depth stabilization and the erosion of the core of the P/AG outflow in terms of salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and turbidity, as it progresses through the Sea of Oman, along the continental shelf. Figure 3 complements Figure 2 by depicting the properties of the bottom waters.
Despite the highly informative nature of these two figures, the study struggles to provide convincing dynamic elements to better understand the origin of the property erosion (as suggested by the article’s title). The study also suffers from the absence of current measurements (LADCP and ship-ADCP), which would provide additional dynamic insights into the flow, such as hydraulic constraints—mentioned but not quantified, for example, with a Froude number—or the intensity of shear, which is also cited but not quantified.
The manuscript title focuses on the control of the outflow by the topographic roughness. One would therefore expect an article explaining the dynamics of the flow along the slope. However, after reading, the only diagnostic addressing this aspect concerns the parameter h_r/H, where h_r is a roughness height and H is the thickness of the outflow. It is unclear how h_r is precisely calculated; I assume that, here, it simply refers to the height of the submarine micro-relief that dots certain parts of the continental slope (if so, based on which bathymetric datasets (multibeam?), at what resolution, what are the limitations, what about the horizontal length scales, …?). As in many other outflows, the gravity-driven flow accelerating along the first significant slopes (here, depths > 170 m) is likely the primary source of erosion (Froude > 1, strong current shear at outflow/ambient fluid, instabilities and mixing). This deep-ward flow is quickly counteracted by the Earth’s rotation on one hand and bottom friction on the other. No element in this article describe this dynamics and we don’t know whether the selected path for Fig. 2 section (white line on Fig. 1) is along the outflow pathway or if it is more or less across its pathway. We don’t even know how rough the bathymetry is (vertical scales, horizontal scales, isolated vs continuous roughness, separation distance between isolated small topographic bumps, …) while such parameters are among the key parameters for inferring the relationship between roughness and mixing (e.g. Özgökmen and Fischer, 2008, as referenced in the text).
The h_r/H parameter is used merely used to suggest that mixing is possible due to the presence, in certain parts of the region, of small relief features where h_r/H > 1, which could potentially generate form drag and wake turbulence. Fair enough, but no quantitative evidence confirms an increase in turbulence in these areas. The article mentions the occurrence of local instabilities in vertical density profiles and portions of profiles that are homogeneous. Perhaps the authors could use this as a starting point to diagnose mixing more precisely and determine whether profiles with strong local instabilities correspond to areas where h_r/H > 1 (or downstream of these obstacles) ? The inclusion of historical datasets with current measurements should have been part of the study to complement and improve the description and quantification of flow dynamics and turbulence, thereby aligning more closely with the title.
Conclusion: The article primarily describes the erosion of the hydrological characteristics of the P/AG outflow plume and its detachment from the topography during its depth stabilization phase. On these descriptive aspects, the article is well-written and easy to read. Some points need clarification. It is also well-supported by appropriate references to past studies. Nevertheless, it fails to address the essential questions implied by the title: If we were to establish a hierarchy of the most important erosion processes referenced in the study, which are the most significant?
To answer these questions, the study must be taken further by using the CTD profiles more extensively, incorporating historical data, or leveraging numerical model outputs. In its current version the manuscript falls short of the expectations from the attractive title. It is very descriptive but lacks of tangible quantification of key parameters.
Note: Additional comments are provided in the commented manuscript.