Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1924
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1924
14 Apr 2026
 | 14 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geochronology (GChron).

A different take on fission-track annealing in apatite

Raymond Jonckheere, Florian Trilsch, Birk Härtel, and Thorsten Nagel

Abstract. This work discusses a model for calculating the mean-lengths of confined fission tracks in apatite after isothermal heating. We derive separate equations for gradual and accelerated high-temperature annealing, and for ambient-temperature annealing. A three-parameter fanning Arrhenius model describes the initial gradual length reduction in all apatites. A linear equation corrects for the different rates of length reduction in different apatite compositions during subsequent accelerated annealing. Another linear equation describes ambient-temperature annealing at lab and geological timescales. At present, these equations give the mean track length in the most and least resistant apatites over their full annealing ranges, at all time-temperature conditions. The aim is not to achieve greater precision or accurateness than existing equations. Instead, we made some choices and concessions in order to combine different datasets, and construct an annealing model that aims to be a reasonable approximation across different apatites and measurement protocols. The calculated age-vs.-depth profile for the Kontinentale Tiefbohrung fits the data almost without compromise for a cooling path constrained by independent geological and thermochronological evidence. In contrast, the mean-length-vs.-depth profile is offset to higher values than the length data. Experimental factors and ambient-temperature annealing could in part be responsible. The inconclusive fit to geological data emphasizes the need for a consensus on a set of reliable geological benchmarks.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Raymond Jonckheere, Florian Trilsch, Birk Härtel, and Thorsten Nagel

Status: open (until 26 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Raymond Jonckheere, Florian Trilsch, Birk Härtel, and Thorsten Nagel
Raymond Jonckheere, Florian Trilsch, Birk Härtel, and Thorsten Nagel
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 15 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Fission-track modelling rest on empirical equations fitted to lab datasets. It is therefore doubtful that a specific set applies to all samples, protocols, and analysts, while there also remain unresolved issues. We propose a different take on the data. Our aim is not to improve existing equations, but to construct the basis of an alternative approach, as a reference for interrogating current assumptions, and perhaps as the beginnings of a model that can connect with the latent-track properties.
Share