Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1910
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1910
04 May 2026
 | 04 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Barometric Pumping as a Driver of Subsurface CO2 Emissions: A Comparative Study of Vadose Zone vs. Groundwater Wells

Ehud Lavner, Avner Gross, Uri Nachshon, Lior Netzer, and Elad Levintal

Abstract. Wells can serve as conduits for gas exchange between the subsurface and the atmosphere. Yet, the controlling gas-transport mechanisms as a function of well type remain insufficiently understood. In this study, we identify and compare the controlling air transport mechanism between two infiltration well types located at the same site under similar soil and climatic conditions – a vadose zone well (i.e., dry well) and a groundwater well (i.e., wet well). During a 1-year experiment, high-resolution CO2 and O2 concentrations were measured at 1-minute intervals in each well, and atmospheric forcing was investigated using barometric pressure and temperature data. The dry well exhibited clear semi-diurnal cycles in CO2 and O2 concentrations that were coupled with fluctuations in atmospheric pressure, confirming barometric pumping (BP) as the dominant air transport mechanism. In contrast, the wet well showed no persistent diurnal oscillations. Instead, air transport was governed by seasonal processes: diffusion-driven stratification during summer and thermal-induced convection (TIC) combined with recharge-related dilution during winter. The groundwater table in the wet well acted as an impermeable boundary to BP, effectively suppressing advective gas exchange. From an environmental perspective, the dry well exhibits higher CO2 emissions than the wet well, primarily due to the dominance of advective transport driven by BP, compared to the more diffusion-dominated transport (with a minor seasonal TIC addition) in the wet well. These results demonstrate that well type strongly controls air transport mechanisms and associated CO2 emissions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ehud Lavner, Avner Gross, Uri Nachshon, Lior Netzer, and Elad Levintal

Status: open (until 15 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ehud Lavner, Avner Gross, Uri Nachshon, Lior Netzer, and Elad Levintal
Ehud Lavner, Avner Gross, Uri Nachshon, Lior Netzer, and Elad Levintal
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Wells can act as pathways for gases to move between underground environments and the atmosphere, yet the processes controlling this exchange are not well understood. We monitored carbon dioxide and oxygen in two types of wells for a year. A dry well released more carbon dioxide because air was pumped by pressure changes, while a groundwater-filled well limited this flow. These findings show that well design strongly influences gas emissions and should be considered in environmental management.
Share