Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1907
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1907
18 May 2026
 | 18 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Multi-sensor tracking of pyroconvection reveals discrepancies between satellite cloud-top detection and convective dynamics

Adrien Guyot, Jacob Vile, Louis Soulard-Fischer, Hamish McGowan, Alain Protat, and Caroline Poulsen

Abstract. Clouds generated by intense wildfires can evolve from pyrocumulus (pyroCu) to pyrocumulonimbus (pyroCb), injecting smoke into the upper troposphere and occasionally the stratosphere. Automated satellite-based detection of pyroCb is therefore critical for monitoring extreme fire–atmosphere interactions, yet such approaches inherently rely on cloud-top properties rather than the underlying convective dynamics.

Here, we evaluate the pyroCb detection algorithm of Peterson et al. (2017), originally developed for GOES observations over North America, in the Australian context using Himawari-8 multispectral imagery during the 2019–2020 Black Summer bushfires. Satellite-derived classifications are assessed against independent observations from operational weather radar and total lightning networks within a multi-sensor framework implemented in the PyroScope platform. An object-based tracking approach is used to compare the temporal evolution of radar- and satellite-derived pyroconvective features.

Satellite observations reliably capture the onset of deep pyroconvective development, showing strong agreement with radar-derived echo-top heights and lightning activity during the early phase. However, a systematic divergence emerges as events evolve, with satellite-derived objects increasingly dominated by horizontally advected anvil structures rather than the actively convecting core. This behaviour is reflected in increasing centroid displacement, decreasing spatial overlap, and an apparent overestimation of plume extent and persistence in satellite retrievals.

To investigate this limitation, we introduce an additional spectral test to separate detached or decaying anvils (class 4) from intense pyroCb (class 5), and explicitly evaluate the impact of this classification on object-based metrics. Restricting the analysis to class 5 reduces the spatial extent and persistence of satellite-derived objects, but does not fully eliminate the divergence with radar observations at later stages, highlighting the inherent limitations of an anvil-based detection paradigm.

These results demonstrate that satellite-based pyroCb detection should be interpreted as a cloud-top representation of pyroconvection rather than a direct measure of the actively convecting core. Multi-sensor integration is therefore essential to distinguish between initiation, mature, and decay phases of pyroconvection. The object-based tracking framework developed here provides a foundation for future studies of pyroCb lifecycle, including the quantification of growth, decay, and potential precursors to pyroCb formation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Adrien Guyot, Jacob Vile, Louis Soulard-Fischer, Hamish McGowan, Alain Protat, and Caroline Poulsen

Status: open (until 24 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Adrien Guyot, Jacob Vile, Louis Soulard-Fischer, Hamish McGowan, Alain Protat, and Caroline Poulsen
Adrien Guyot, Jacob Vile, Louis Soulard-Fischer, Hamish McGowan, Alain Protat, and Caroline Poulsen
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 19 May 2026
Download
Short summary
We studied how extreme wildfire clouds are detected from space and compared this with weather radar and lightning observations. We found that satellites can reliably detect when these clouds begin, but later tend to track spreading cloud tops rather than the active storm itself. This can make events appear larger and longer-lasting than they are. Combining different types of observations is therefore essential to better understand and monitor these dangerous fire-driven storms.
Share