Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1904
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1904
10 Jun 2026
 | 10 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Integrating propagation and recovery dynamics into groundwater drought vulnerability assessment through exposure, pressure, and aquifer system response

Katarzyna Sawicka and Klaudia Jurzyk

Abstract. Groundwater drought is influenced more by system-specific response dynamics than by meteorological forcing alone. We introduce a multi-scale framework that combines exposure, pressure, and sensitivity with process-based metrics of drought propagation and recovery to assess groundwater drought vulnerability. The Drought Impact Potential Index (DIPI) is developed and tested across a regional aquifer system. Propagation probability, median recovery time, and resilience metrics are examined across temporal scales and in groundwater systems at different depths. The findings reveal that spatial vulnerability patterns are driven by variations in system memory and response time. Deeper aquifer systems tend to have higher propagation probability, longer recovery periods, and increased vulnerability, indicating delayed responses and persistent drought signals. Conversely, shallower systems respond more quickly and recover faster, leading to lower drought persistence. The spatial distribution of DIPI remains consistent whether using weighted or unweighted versions, confirming that the identified patterns are robust and reflect fundamental hydrogeological controls. These results demonstrate that groundwater drought vulnerability arises from interactions between external forcing and internal system dynamics and cannot be understood solely through static indicators. An area-based analysis of exposure–pressure contrast shows that 60.4 % of the study area is dominated by the intrinsic system response, compared to 21.8 % driven primarily by human pressure. The proposed framework offers a process-based approach for groundwater drought assessment and can be applied to other diverse aquifer systems.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Katarzyna Sawicka and Klaudia Jurzyk

Status: open (until 22 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Katarzyna Sawicka and Klaudia Jurzyk

Data sets

Processed groundwater drought datasets for Groundwater Body no. 43: SPI, SGI, drought metrics, and DIPI components Katarzyna Sawicka https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19371351

Interactive computing environment

Reproducible Jupyter notebooks for SPI–SGI processing, drought metrics, and DIPI workflow Katarzyna Sawicka https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19371351

Katarzyna Sawicka and Klaudia Jurzyk
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 10 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Groundwater drought impacts depend not only on rainfall deficits but also on aquifer storage and release processes. We integrated drought timing, recovery behaviour, human pressures, and environmental sensitivity to identify the most vulnerable areas. Deep aquifers showed delayed but longer-lasting droughts, whereas shallow systems recovered faster. The framework is transferable and supports groundwater management under combined climate and anthropogenic stress.
Share