the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Modeling the potential hazard of wildfires under the influence of climatic, vegetative and anthropogenic factors in the Andean and Amazonian regions of Peru
Abstract. Wildfires and their associated impacts have increased significantly over the past two decades, heightening the risk to human life and causing substantial damage to forest ecosystems in the Amazon and Andean regions. To mitigate these impacts, the assessment of both seasonal and intra-seasonal wildfire hazard is of critical importance. The availability of satellite data, together with the implementation of regional wildfire early warning systems based on hazard indices, represents a key component in reducing wildfire risk. This study aims to develop a new short-term wildfire hazard model based on both observational and satellite-derived datasets, including data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM). The proposed Wildfire Hazard Index (WHI) is derived from Dry-Day Frequency (DDF), the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), cultivated area (CA), and forest fuel (FF). A wildfire hazard classification scheme (extreme, very high, high, moderate, and low) is introduced to generate hazard maps. The results indicate that DDF, NDVI, CA, and FF are key variables for analyzing the spatial and temporal variability of wildfire hazard. Lower WHI values correspond to lower wildfire hazard, and vice versa. The findings suggest that the model adequately represents seasonal wildfire hazard, demonstrating consistency among WHI values, wildfire occurrence, and MODIS-derived hotspots. Overall, this study shows that the proposed method can support hazard classification and contribute to the implementation of regional wildfire early warning systems based on precipitation forecasts in the Amazon and Andean regions.
- Preprint
(3012 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 11 Jun 2026)
-
AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1902', Ricardo Zubieta, 14 Apr 2026
reply
ERRATUMPage 17, Figure 8 :It says:(a) 16–23 November 2026It should say:(a) 16–23 November 2016ReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-1902-AC1 -
CC1: 'RC1 - Comment on egusphere-2026-1902', Ana Gonçalves, 29 May 2026
reply
The manuscript addresses a relevant and timely topic: the assessment of wildfire hazard in the Andean and Amazonian regions of Peru, where fire activity has important ecological, social, and operational implications. The proposed Wildfire Hazard Index (WHI) has potential value for regional wildfire monitoring and early warning applications.
The study is clearly motivated and uses datasets that are broadly appropriate for this type of regional hazard assessment. The attempt to develop an interpretable index, rather than relying only on complex data-driven methods, is also a positive aspect, particularly for operational use in data-limited regions.
However, the manuscript would benefit from substantial revision before publication. In particular, the methodological choices behind the construction of the WHI, its weighting scheme, hazard classification, and validation need to be explained more clearly and justified more rigorously (I don't think “calibration” is the best word to describe what you did). I also recommend reorganizing the Results section so that the model outputs are first presented as results of the proposed WHI, followed by a separate section dedicated to model validation or evaluation. This would make the distinction between model results and model performance clearer.
Overall, the manuscript has potential and addresses an important regional gap, but its scientific robustness and presentation need to be strengthened. I therefore recommend major revisions. I’ll go over the specific comments (in the attachment). I know they might seem like a lot (or a bit long), but it’s just to explain why I think the way I do, and also to have a little “discussion” of ideas among us.
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1902', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 May 2026
reply
The manuscript addresses a relevant and timely topic: the assessment of wildfire hazard in the Andean and Amazonian regions of Peru, where fire activity has important ecological, social, and operational implications. The proposed Wildfire Hazard Index (WHI) has potential value for regional wildfire monitoring and early warning applications.
The study is clearly motivated and uses datasets that are broadly appropriate for this type of regional hazard assessment. The attempt to develop an interpretable index, rather than relying only on complex data-driven methods, is also a positive aspect, particularly for operational use in data-limited regions.
However, the manuscript would benefit from substantial revision before publication. In particular, the methodological choices behind the construction of the WHI, its weighting scheme, hazard classification, and validation need to be explained more clearly and justified more rigorously (I don't think “calibration” is the best word to describe what you did). I also recommend reorganizing the Results section so that the model outputs are first presented as results of the proposed WHI, followed by a separate section dedicated to model validation or evaluation. This would make the distinction between model results and model performance clearer.
Overall, the manuscript has potential and addresses an important regional gap, but its scientific robustness and presentation need to be strengthened. I’ll go over the specific comments (in the attachment). I know they might seem like a lot (or a bit long), but it’s just to explain why I think the way I do, and also to have a little “discussion” of ideas among us.
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 272 | 66 | 18 | 356 | 20 | 19 |
- HTML: 272
- PDF: 66
- XML: 18
- Total: 356
- BibTeX: 20
- EndNote: 19
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1