Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1900
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1900
19 Jun 2026
 | 19 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Evaluation of WRF-Chem (version 4.7.1) aeolian dust emission and land surface models over the dust belt

Semontee Deb, Elena Louca, Angelos Violaris, Pantelis Kiriakidis, Yannis Proestos, Jonilda Kushta, Antonis Gkikas, Andrea Pozzer, and Theodoros Christoudias

Abstract. Aeolian dust is a key component of the Earth system, influencing biogeochemical cycles, cloud microphysics, and the radiative energy budget and atmospheric dynamics, while also degrading air quality around major source regions. The representation of mineral dust remains a major challenge for regional and global atmospheric models due to uncertainties in emission processes, land-surface interactions, together with limited availability of observations. In this study, we present the first comprehensive, year-long evaluation of the simulated dust with the WRF-Chem model (v4.7.1) over the dust belt spanning North Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. We evaluate an ensemble of six simulations using three widely applied dust emission schemes (GOCART, GOCART-AFWA, and University of Cologne – UoC) combined with two advanced land surface models (LSM): Noah-MP and CLM4. The model performance is evaluated through a set of observations, including the MODIS-derived MIDAS dust optical depth product, AERONET aerosol optical depth (AOD), ERA5-Land surface soil moisture and wind speed, and EMEP coarse particulate matter (PM10-PM2.5) measurements. We find that among the dust emission schemes, GOCART provides the most robust agreement with MIDAS and AERONET, closely followed by AFWA but with a wider spread, while UoC systematically diverges from observations failing to represent realistic column dust optical depth. Evaluation of surface drivers reveals that land-surface representation exerts a strong influence on dust emission magnitude and spatial distribution, with Noah-MP yielding systematically better agreement with observed meteorology and AOD, whereas CLM4 introduces more pronounced regional discrepancies. UoC exhibits improved alignment with coarse particulate matter measurements at the EMEP stations compared to GOCART and AFWA. Finally, we provide empirical scaling factors derived for each emissions mechanism–LSM pairing, applicable for WRF-Chem dust simulations, offering guidance for improved dust and air quality, and climate modelling applications.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Semontee Deb, Elena Louca, Angelos Violaris, Pantelis Kiriakidis, Yannis Proestos, Jonilda Kushta, Antonis Gkikas, Andrea Pozzer, and Theodoros Christoudias

Status: open (until 14 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Semontee Deb, Elena Louca, Angelos Violaris, Pantelis Kiriakidis, Yannis Proestos, Jonilda Kushta, Antonis Gkikas, Andrea Pozzer, and Theodoros Christoudias
Semontee Deb, Elena Louca, Angelos Violaris, Pantelis Kiriakidis, Yannis Proestos, Jonilda Kushta, Antonis Gkikas, Andrea Pozzer, and Theodoros Christoudias
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 19 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
This study presents an extensive model evaluation of WRF-Chem (v4.7.1) dust simulations over the dust belt. We test three dust emission schemes and two land surface models using different measurements and reanalysis datasets. Our results identify effective model configurations and propose empirical scaling factors that improve dust representation and may be applicable more broadly.
Share