Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1871
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1871
19 May 2026
 | 19 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Machine learning-based emission rate estimates of global methane super-emissions

Clayton Roberts, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Tobias A. de Jong, Berend J. Schuit, Shubham Sharma, Theo Huegens, Anne-Wil van den Berg, Sander Houweling, and Ilse Aben

Abstract. Methane, the second most important greenhouse gas, has a global warming potential more than 80 times that of carbon dioxide over a 20-year period. Given its decadal atmospheric lifetime, reducing anthropogenic methane emissions is critical for limiting near-term warming. The TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) provides daily global methane satellite observations, enabling rapid detection of super-emitters. Here, we develop ML-SPERE, a machine-learning framework based on a convolutional neural network trained on simulated TROPOMI methane observations and meteorological data to estimate emission rates for super-emitters. ML-SPERE outperforms the Integrated Mass Enhancement (IME) method on simulated plumes that incorporate real TROPOMI backgrounds and missing spatial data, reducing the median absolute percentage error from 42.4% to 24.3% for well-observed methane plumes. ML-SPERE estimates also do not exhibit the low wind-speed dependent biases present in IME estimates. Applied to TROPOMI observations of a 200-day well blowout in Kazakhstan, ML-SPERE shows better agreement with inverse modeling results and estimates from high-resolution point-source imagers than TROPOMI IME estimates do. Global spatial patterns of methane emissions inferred from ML-SPERE and the IME method for all super-emitters found by TROPOMI in 2021 are broadly consistent, with notable regional differences in northern Russia (where transient pipeline may not be well characterized by either method), the Congo Basin (where IME estimates are potentially inflated due to the large spatial extent of plumes), and southeastern Australia (where IME estimates are potentially negatively biased owing to predominantly low wind speeds). Mean estimated emission rates for this dataset aggregated by estimated source sector remain similar between both methods. Overall, improved performance on simulated plumes and consistency with independent estimates for real-world observations demonstrate the utility of ML-SPERE for quantifying TROPOMI methane super-emitters.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Clayton Roberts, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Tobias A. de Jong, Berend J. Schuit, Shubham Sharma, Theo Huegens, Anne-Wil van den Berg, Sander Houweling, and Ilse Aben

Status: open (until 24 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Clayton Roberts, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Tobias A. de Jong, Berend J. Schuit, Shubham Sharma, Theo Huegens, Anne-Wil van den Berg, Sander Houweling, and Ilse Aben
Clayton Roberts, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Tobias A. de Jong, Berend J. Schuit, Shubham Sharma, Theo Huegens, Anne-Wil van den Berg, Sander Houweling, and Ilse Aben
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 19 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas, and cutting its emissions can slow climate change in the near term. We have created a new machine-learning based method that uses satellite methane observations and weather data to better estimate emission rates for large methane plumes. It has proved more accurate than an existing physics-based method when tested on simulated satellite observations. When applied to real satellite observations, our method produces estimates that agree with other methods.
Share