Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1858
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1858
16 Apr 2026
 | 16 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscience Communication (GC).

Interdisciplinary Research in Geosciences: A View from Early Career Scientists

Inge Wiekenkamp, Valby van Schijndel, Jacob Hardt, Jonas Kuppler, Ramesh Glückler, Izabella Baisheva, Patricio Yeste, Paul Einhäupl, Maria Rosa Scicchitano, and Simeon Lisovski

Abstract. Geosciences are often described as interdisciplinary, yet research and training remain fragmented across sub-disciplines and institutions. To understand how early career scientists (ECS) experience and practice interdisciplinarity, and which support structures actually help, we conducted an online survey within the German Geo.X research network. This yielded 151 valid responses that were included in the analysis. Participants broadly value interdisciplinarity for fostering the exchange of ideas across disciplines, providing novel perspectives, and enhancing their capacity to address complex problems. At the same time, they report recurrent barriers that directly affect research efficiency and career progression, including incompatible terminologies, different working speeds, and diverging publication strategies. The results indicate that strengthening interdisciplinary geosciences requires not only incentives for collaboration, but also training in cross-disciplinary communication, and transparent publication and evaluation pathways that acknowledge the increasing coordination efforts. Research networks such as Geo.X provide a strong foundation for initiating advancing interdisciplinary collaboration and can serve as effective instruments. Network structures are particularly well-suited to this purpose, as they are flexible enough to test new formats and innovative ideas as pilot projects. This requires that their initiatives are clearly communicated, easily accessible, and well aligned with the working realities of early career scientists, while also reducing coordination costs by fostering continuity, shared reference frames, and trust across sub-disciplines.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Inge Wiekenkamp, Valby van Schijndel, Jacob Hardt, Jonas Kuppler, Ramesh Glückler, Izabella Baisheva, Patricio Yeste, Paul Einhäupl, Maria Rosa Scicchitano, and Simeon Lisovski

Status: open (until 11 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Inge Wiekenkamp, Valby van Schijndel, Jacob Hardt, Jonas Kuppler, Ramesh Glückler, Izabella Baisheva, Patricio Yeste, Paul Einhäupl, Maria Rosa Scicchitano, and Simeon Lisovski
Inge Wiekenkamp, Valby van Schijndel, Jacob Hardt, Jonas Kuppler, Ramesh Glückler, Izabella Baisheva, Patricio Yeste, Paul Einhäupl, Maria Rosa Scicchitano, and Simeon Lisovski
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 16 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
We conducted a survey on the topic of “interdisciplinarity” among early-career researchers in order to learn about their experiences. There are very different views on what interdisciplinarity means and many positive aspects are cited that enhance research, but there are also a few obstacles when it comes to communication, time management, and publication. It is precisely these obstacles that should be given greater consideration in education and research funding.
Share