the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Vertical distribution, optical characterization and automated classification of airborne pollen from in-situ measurements
Abstract. Bioaerosols, such as pollen grains, play an important role in air quality, human health and atmospheric processes. However, their vertical distribution within the boundary layer remains insufficiently researched. In this study, we investigate the vertical profiles of pollen concentrations between 4 and 272 m a.g.l. at the Vehmasmäki station in Eastern Finland. In–situ measurements with optical pollen sensors at 4 m, 115 m, and 272 m were conducted simultaneously with ground-based observations from a Hirst-type volumetric air sampler and a Cloud Droplet Analyzer. Multiple campaigns were conducted during pollen seasons between 2021–2024, focusing on the dominant pollen types, i.e., birch and pine pollen. Optical pollen sensors agreed with Cloud Droplet Analyzer measurements during intensive pollen periods (R2 ≥ 0.91). Polarization scatter plots for birch and pine pollen revealed distinct optical signatures, during predefined intensive pollen periods between 2021–2023, consistent with laboratory results. Furthermore, we assess how background fine-mode aerosol influences these signatures. During a major birch pollen episode in May 2024, pollen concentrations decreased with height. These vertical profiles were compared with predictions from the System for Integrated modeLling of Atmospheric coMposition (SILAM), which reproduced the vertical distribution from the observations, but systematically overestimated pollen concentrations at all heights. Moreover, a machine–learning classification approach combining optical pollen sensor measurements and meteorological variables demonstrated the possibility of identification of dominant pollen types. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of optical pollen sensors for continuous, real–time monitoring of dominant pollen taxa in boreal regions, from measurements in Vehmasmäki.
- Preprint
(1673 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 14 Aug 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1806', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Jul 2026 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1806', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Jul 2026
reply
The manuscript presents an interesting and useful study on the vertical distribution and optical characterization of airborne pollen. The multi-height measurements and the combination of different instruments make the study valuable for the field of aerobiology and real-time pollen monitoring. Overall, the manuscript is well organized and scientifically relevant. However, some methodological and interpretative points would benefit from further clarification before publication. My detailed comments and suggestions are provided in the attached review file.
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 158 | 42 | 10 | 210 | 14 | 20 |
- HTML: 158
- PDF: 42
- XML: 10
- Total: 210
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Accept after technical corrections
The authors investigated the vertical distribution of boundary-layer pollen concentrations at the Vehmasmäki station in Eastern Finland. They monitored pollen using optical pollen sensors at 4 m, 115 m, and 272 m simultaneously with ground-based observations from a Hirst-type volumetric air sampler and a Cloud Droplet Analyzer. Additionally, they applied a machine-learning approach to classify automatically the dominant pollen types by training the PS2 instrument with reference pollen grains. The findings were also compared against SILAM model predictions.
Under the global change prism real-time bioaerosol monitoring is essential and intercomparison studies between newly developed automated instruments and traditional standard methods are vital. The authors' multi-height, multi-instrument approach integrating LiDAR, PS2 sensors, and Hirst-type devices is well-designed and executed. The manuscript is cohesive and well-structured. The methodology is robust and the findings are clearly communicated. A few technical corrections can be found in the attached manuscript.