| 02 Apr 2026
Characterization of Dust Aerosol Source Types and Associated Shortwave Direct Radiative Effects Over Cyprus: A Seven-Year Study
Abstract. Atmospheric mineral dust modulates surface solar radiation, with important implications for regional climate and solar energy production. In this study, we investigate dust aerosol typing and associated shortwave (SW) direct radiative effects (DREs) using radiative transfer simulations over Cyprus using a seven-year dataset (2015–2022) from the Agia Marina Xyliatou station. Dust events were identified using AERONET optical properties, lidar observations, MODIS imagery, and classified by origin (Sahara or Middle East) based on HYSPLIT back-trajectories analysis. Dust accounts for ~28.3 % of aerosol cases during spring (MAM) and ~12.7 % during autumn (SON), with 86 % of events originating from the Sahara and 14% from the Middle East. The mean AOD at 440 nm for the period studied here is 0.33 ± 0.08 for Saharan events and 0.38 ± 0.09 for Middle Eastern events, while the SSA at 440 nm remains high for both sources (0.93 ± 0.04 and 0.94 ± 0.03, respectively), indicating predominantly scattering aerosols. Radiative transfer estimates of global horizontal irradiance (GHI) agree well with ground-based irradiance measurements, with ~87 % of modelled GHI values within ±5 % and ~96 % within ±10 % of observations. The mean surface SW DREs are −84 ± 49 W m−2 for Saharan dust in March and −79 ± 33 W m−2 for Middle Eastern dust in October. At the top of the atmosphere (TOA), the estimated cooling reaches −27 W m−2, while atmospheric heating peaks at +72 ± 45 W m−2. Although the Ångström exponent is slightly higher for Middle Eastern dust (0.36 vs. 0.28), suggesting enhanced fine-mode contribution due to aerosol mixing, radiative forcing efficiencies are comparable, indicating that aerosol loading primarily controls the magnitude of radiative perturbations.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors serves as editor for the special issue to which this paper belongs.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
