Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1757
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1757
10 Apr 2026
 | 10 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Sensitivity analysis and scaling of tsunamis generated by granular flows at Stromboli volcano: A numerical modeling approach

Matteo Trolese, Matteo Cerminara, Tomaso Esposti Ongaro, Mattia de’ Michieli Vitturi, and Alessandro Tadini

Abstract. Tsunamis generated by gravitational flows at volcanic islands pose a significant hazard, yet the sensitivity of wave heights to key source parameters remains poorly constrained. Using the non-hydrostatic multilayer HySEA model, we perform an extensive parametric study to assess the sensitivity of granular flow-generated tsunami wave heights at Stromboli volcano to six physical parameters: slide volume, initial submergence depth (elevation), density, basal friction, water-coupling coefficient, and source azimuth. A variance-based Sobol sensitivity analysis reveals that for the combined dataset of subaerial and submarine flows, the initial elevation (contributing ∼61 % to output variance normalized to 100 %) and volume (∼22 %) are the dominant controls on maximum wave height. When analyzed separately, subaerial tsunamis are primarily controlled by volume (∼60 %), while submarine tsunamis show a balanced sensitivity to volume (∼35 %) and initial submergence depth (∼37 %). We identify distinct scaling relationships between maximum wave height and landslide volume: a linear one for submarine landslides, with an exponential decay in efficiency as a function of submergence depth; a logarithmic fit for subaerial landslides, where the efficiency of wave generation per unit volume decreases for larger events. These relationships, modulated by secondary parameters like friction, provide a quantitative framework for rapid tsunami hazard assessment. Our results demonstrate a crossover in hazard potential, where subaerial slides tend to produce larger tsunami waves for smaller volumes, while submarine slides can produce larger waves for larger volumes due to the absence of logarithmic saturation. These results constrain the scaling laws needed to quickly invert tsunami observations into source volumes (and viceversa) and improve probabilistic hazard assessments by identifying the parameters that dominate uncertainty at Stromboli and similar islands.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Matteo Trolese, Matteo Cerminara, Tomaso Esposti Ongaro, Mattia de’ Michieli Vitturi, and Alessandro Tadini

Status: open (until 22 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Matteo Trolese, Matteo Cerminara, Tomaso Esposti Ongaro, Mattia de’ Michieli Vitturi, and Alessandro Tadini
Matteo Trolese, Matteo Cerminara, Tomaso Esposti Ongaro, Mattia de’ Michieli Vitturi, and Alessandro Tadini
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 10 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
To better understand volcanic tsunamis, we simulated thousands of granular flows at Stromboli volcano. For flows starting above water, volume dictates the wave size. For underwater flows, volume and starting depth are equally important. These findings establish simple scaling rules to quickly predict tsunami sizes based on flow characteristics, vastly improving hazard assessments and emergency planning for coastal communities threatened by volcanic avalanches.
Share