Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1749
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1749
18 May 2026
 | 18 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

The dominant role of latent spatial structure in landslide susceptibility

Edier Aristizábal, Luigi Lombardo, and Oliver Korup

Abstract. Landslide susceptibility mapping is essential for risk management and mitigation. Traditional multivariate models have achieved high nominal accuracy in predicting landslide occurrence, but the underlying methods rarely account for spatial dependence in the input data. We test how spatial Hierarchical Generalized Linear Models (HGLMs) and spatial autoregressive models might enhance both accuracy and reliability of landslide susceptibility. We estimate the frequency of landslides in a catchment, drawing on a catalogue of 10,837 landslides and several predictors (e.g., rainfall, elevation, slope) in the northern Colombian Andes. Our HGLMs integrate the effects of spatial dependency and heterogeneity through Markov Random Field (MRF) models, i.e. Intrinsic Conditional Autoregressive (ICAR), Besag-York-Mollié (BYM), and Leroux models. Our results show that landslide frequency is significantly influenced by spatially-dependent unobserved factors, likely representing contiguous geological formations or shared soil properties, which we therefore incorporate as latent variables. Even after accounting for known covariates, the HGLMs capture spatial dependencies that non-spatial models fail to address. Incorporating spatial structure in the data improves model performance, judging from model selection metrics such as the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) or the Watanabe–Akaike Information Criterion (WAIC). By accounting for latent spatial effects, spatial HGLMs produce smoother and more reliable susceptibility maps. This approach overcomes a key limitation of traditional models: the underestimation of landslide frequency in high-density areas where unobserved, spatially-structured factors are most influential. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating spatial dependence and heterogeneity in landslide susceptibility models to achieve enhanced predictive performance and reliability.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Edier Aristizábal, Luigi Lombardo, and Oliver Korup

Status: open (until 30 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Edier Aristizábal, Luigi Lombardo, and Oliver Korup

Data sets

database Edier Aristizabal https://github.com/edieraristizabal/PAPER_BHGLM

Edier Aristizábal, Luigi Lombardo, and Oliver Korup
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 19 May 2026
Download
Short summary
Traditional models for landslide susceptibility often ignore spatially-dependent unobserved factors. This study improves accuracy in the Colombian Andes by incorporating spatial dependence and landscape variety, which are natural in environmental data. By accounting for these hidden physical connections, we found that landslide occurrences are more clustered than once thought.
Share