the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
High-frequency monitoring of SO2 plumes from moderate-scale volcanic eruptions using a synergy of GEO and LEO satellites: A case study of the 2024 Kanlaon eruption
Abstract. Satellite remote sensing is crucial for monitoring volcanic sulfur dioxide (SO2) globally. However, the rapid evolution of volcanic plumes necessitates high-frequency observations, which typical twice-daily overpasses of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) sensors fail to capture. To address this limitation, this study presents a synergistic Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) and LEO observation framework. Specifically, we show the first quantitative SO2 retrieval from a GEO hyperspectral infrared sounder (FY-4B/GIIRS), using an optimal-estimation-based retrieval algorithm. Because current and upcoming GEO infrared sounders lack the strong ν3 absorption band, our algorithm uniquely leverages the weaker ν1 absorption band. Simulation experiments indicate that the detection limit (retrieval error > 100 %) is 3 DU for plumes at 10 km altitude. During the June 2024 Kanlaon eruption, GIIRS captured early, high-concentration plume dynamics, though tracking diluted plumes remained challenging. Crucially, it provided the earliest satellite detection by continuously monitoring the initial nighttime burst (posterior error of 53.7 ± 24.1 %), filling critical temporal gaps left by ultraviolet sensors. Combined with LEO (HIRAS, IASI, CrIS, TROPOMI and MLS) and GEO sensor (GEMS), the synergistic framework achieved high frequency quantification of SO2 mass loading and transport pathways. We estimated a peak SO2 mass loading of ∼40 kt and an e-folding time of 5.2 ± 0.5 days. Furthermore, multi-platform observations identified significant discrepancies in the CAMS global model regarding the plume's evolution and magnitude. This geostationary-driven synergistic framework delivers high-fidelity observational records, establishing a robust basis for monitoring moderate-scale volcanic events and evaluating atmospheric chemical transport models.
- Preprint
(3262 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(11051 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1745', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Jul 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Shangyi Liu, 29 Oct 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-1745/egusphere-2026-1745-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Shangyi Liu, 29 Oct 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1745', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Aug 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-1745/egusphere-2026-1745-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Shangyi Liu, 29 Oct 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-1745/egusphere-2026-1745-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Shangyi Liu, 29 Oct 2026
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1745', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Jul 2026
Review comments on High-frequency monitoring of SO2 plumes from moderate-scale volcanic eruptions using a synergy of GEO and LEO satellites: A case study of the 2024 Kanlaon eruption
General comments:
This study integrates SO2 plume height and column density retrieval from several GEO and LEO satellites to exhibit a case study of the 2024 Kanlaon eruption. The main innovation of this study is the weak v1 absorption band is leveraged to estimate SO2 column density for FY-4B/GIIRS. The large differences between satellite retrievals and model simulations demonstrate the significance of the synergy of GEO and LEO satellites. Some comments should be addressed before the consideration of its publication.
Specific comments:
- Water vapor strongly absorbs radiation in both v1 and v3 band as shown Fig. 2. How does it affect the retrievals of SO2 plume height and column density? Should water vapor profiles or water vapor column concentrations be determined prior to the retrieval of SO2 plume height and column density?
- Are the Jacobians in Sect. 3.1 sensitive to the variation in SO2 columns. A constant SO2 column density of 10 DU for each layer is used to while the true SO2 column density could be quite different from the assumed constant. How does it effect the calculation HRI(h)? Will it lead to significant uncertainty of HRI(h), hence the plume height estimation?
- More explanations are needed for “Notably, the SO2 layer height for the FY-4B/GIIRS observations is constrained using the retrieval results from the synergistic HIRAS and CrIS.” How are the retrieve results applied to retrieve SO2 layer height for the FY-4B/GIIRS observations?
- 3b and 3d are good. I suggest revising the vertical axis, with lower atmospheric levels at the bottom and upper levels at the top. This will avoid such misunderstanding when reader do not examine the figures carefully.
- Line 50-59: All acronyms and abbreviations should be spelled out upon their first occurrence.
- The subscript 2 in SO2 is often missing in many places.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1745-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Shangyi Liu, 29 Oct 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-1745/egusphere-2026-1745-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1745', Anonymous Referee #2, 04 Aug 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-1745/egusphere-2026-1745-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Shangyi Liu, 29 Oct 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-1745/egusphere-2026-1745-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Shangyi Liu, 29 Oct 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 524 | 308 | 74 | 906 | 287 | 55 | 70 |
- HTML: 524
- PDF: 308
- XML: 74
- Total: 906
- Supplement: 287
- BibTeX: 55
- EndNote: 70
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Review comments on High-frequency monitoring of SO2 plumes from moderate-scale volcanic eruptions using a synergy of GEO and LEO satellites: A case study of the 2024 Kanlaon eruption
General comments:
This study integrates SO2 plume height and column density retrieval from several GEO and LEO satellites to exhibit a case study of the 2024 Kanlaon eruption. The main innovation of this study is the weak v1 absorption band is leveraged to estimate SO2 column density for FY-4B/GIIRS. The large differences between satellite retrievals and model simulations demonstrate the significance of the synergy of GEO and LEO satellites. Some comments should be addressed before the consideration of its publication.
Specific comments: