Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1722
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1722
13 Apr 2026
 | 13 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).

Post-Disturbance Soil Monitoring in Forests using Remote Sensing: An Evidence Map

Maisy Roach-Krajewski, Xavier Giroux-Bougard, David Paré, Catlan Dallaire, Luc Guindon, Florian Jordan, Charlotte Norris, Kara Webster, and Jérôme Laganière

Abstract. Forest soils underpin ecosystem resilience and productivity but are increasingly threatened by natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Monitoring post‑disturbance soil degradation at operational scales remains challenging in forests, where ground‑signal obstruction and reliance on proxy indicators constrain remote sensing (RS) applications. To identify where RS can benefit soil monitoring and support emerging reporting needs, we developed a structured evidence map of studies assessing post‑disturbance forest soil degradation using RS methods. From 4,338 records, 72 primary studies were synthesized across disturbance types, biomes, platforms, scales, and indicators. The evidence base is dominated by wildfire and harvesting, reflecting disturbance pathways that produce observable surface impacts. Multispectral satellite data remain the primary tool for mapping post‑fire severity and erosion‑related indicators, while LiDAR and stereo‑photogrammetry are most often used to quantify surface deformation after harvest operations. Indicators tied to subsurface physical, chemical, or biological change remain sparsely represented due to observability limits. Overall, RS is most effective for mapping disturbance footprints, detecting surface‑expressed indicators, and stratifying landscapes for targeted field assessment, rather than directly measuring soil properties. This evidence map clarifies the benefits and limits of RS, identifies persistent gaps, and highlights priorities for developing disturbance‑aware soil‑monitoring frameworks. It also specifies which soil indicators are defensibly observable with RS and which require complementary approaches. By linking disturbance processes to observable indicators, this synthesis helps define realistic RS‑supported objectives for reporting frameworks within national forest monitoring and assessment programs.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Maisy Roach-Krajewski, Xavier Giroux-Bougard, David Paré, Catlan Dallaire, Luc Guindon, Florian Jordan, Charlotte Norris, Kara Webster, and Jérôme Laganière

Status: open (until 25 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Maisy Roach-Krajewski, Xavier Giroux-Bougard, David Paré, Catlan Dallaire, Luc Guindon, Florian Jordan, Charlotte Norris, Kara Webster, and Jérôme Laganière

Data sets

Post-Disturbance Soil Monitoring in Forests using Remote Sensing: An Evidence Map M. Roach-Krajewski et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19225706

Maisy Roach-Krajewski, Xavier Giroux-Bougard, David Paré, Catlan Dallaire, Luc Guindon, Florian Jordan, Charlotte Norris, Kara Webster, and Jérôme Laganière
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 13 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
This study reviews how remote sensing is used to monitor forest soil degradation after disturbance. It shows that remote sensing works best when wildfire or harvesting create visible surface change, while monitoring subsurface soil degradation still requires field measurement. Satellite data support large‑scale screening, and laser scanning and photogrammetry detect localized machinery impacts. These findings clarify realistic uses of remote sensing for forest soil monitoring and reporting.
Share