Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1661
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1661
17 Jun 2026
 | 17 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Quantifying the scaling penalty of sequential coupling: The sequential coupling cost (Cseq) metric for Earth System Model components

Oriol Tintó Prims, Sergi Palomas, Simone Vacondio, and Mario C. Acosta

Abstract. Coupling strategies in Earth System Models significantly influence their computational performance and resource efficiency. While coupling costs are traditionally evaluated in the context of concurrent implementations, the cost implications of sequential coupling approaches remain poorly quantified. In this work, we define and formalize the sequential coupling cost (Cseq): the additional computational resources required for a sequentially coupled ESM to achieve performance parity with an optimized concurrent setup.

We develop an analytical framework that utilizes individual component scalability profiles, derived directly from model execution logs, to diagnose inefficiencies inherent in sequential coupling architectures. To demonstrate the versatility of the metric, we apply it to three structurally distinct coupling scenarios, using models widely used by the community: atmosphere–ocean (IFS–NEMO), ocean–sea ice (NEMO–SI3), and atmosphere–aerosols (IFS–M7).

Our analysis reveals that sequential coupling imposes a substantial, yet often overlooked, efficiency deficit. By forcing all components to share a fixed resource pool, this approach ignores potential component-level parallelism and creates an exclusive reliance on domain-decomposition as a scaling strategy. While scaling solely via domain decomposition is sustainable in linear scaling regimes, it accelerates the loss of efficiency as soon as components enter sub-linear scaling regimes. We demonstrate that to achieve target throughputs, sequential setups often necessitate significant over-provisioning of computational resources, leading inefficiencies that traditional metrics fail to capture. The proposed Cseq metric quantifies these structural overheads, offering a quantitative basis for informing the design and architectural choices of next-generation exascale Earth System Models.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Oriol Tintó Prims, Sergi Palomas, Simone Vacondio, and Mario C. Acosta

Status: open (until 12 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Oriol Tintó Prims, Sergi Palomas, Simone Vacondio, and Mario C. Acosta
Oriol Tintó Prims, Sergi Palomas, Simone Vacondio, and Mario C. Acosta
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 17 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Earth System models are our main tools to study the climate. They consist of different components, like the atmosphere and ocean. We investigated the hidden inefficiencies of running these components one after the other rather than simultaneously. By defining a new metric, we enable developers to quantify the exact cost of this sequential approach. This helps identify wasted computing resources, ultimately guiding the design of faster and more efficient climate models for the future.
Share