Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1658
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1658
20 Apr 2026
 | 20 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Hybrid implicit–explicit XFEM simulation of injection-induced seismicity: resolving multi-scale rupture nucleation and dynamics

Mohammad Sabah, Mauro Cacace, Inga Berre, Iman R. Kivi, and Hannes Hofmann

Abstract. This study introduces a new hybrid implicit–explicit (IMEX) time-integration method for simulating injection-induced fault reactivation within a fully coupled hydromechanical extended finite element (XFEM) framework. Modeling these systems is inherently difficult because of the extreme difference in temporal scales – ranging from days for fluid diffusion to less than milliseconds for dynamic rupture. While fully implicit schemes provide unconditional stability, our results show that numerical accuracy during rupture nucleation is strictly controlled by the minimum time step used. Under-resolving these rapid transients causes delayed instability, lower slip rates, and underestimated seismic moments. Importantly, the temporal resolution needed to accurately capture rupture propagation is approximately the same as the critical time step set by the Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) condition. To address this, the proposed IMEX strategy uses an implicit solver for quasi-static loading and switches smoothly to a fully dynamic explicit update once a slip-velocity threshold is reached. This hybrid approach significantly reduces computational costs – by 60–77 % compared to fully implicit simulations – while still accurately capturing fault slip, stress changes, and seismic magnitudes. Fully implicit solutions tend to predict slightly higher peak slip velocities and rupture speeds, but event timing and final deformation are consistent across both methods. Additionally, we show that the efficiency of the IMEX framework scales independently of the calculation of the complex slip tangent operator, providing a robust and efficient solution for multi-scale subsurface hazard assessment.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Geoscientific Model Development.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Mohammad Sabah, Mauro Cacace, Inga Berre, Iman R. Kivi, and Hannes Hofmann

Status: open (until 15 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Mohammad Sabah, Mauro Cacace, Inga Berre, Iman R. Kivi, and Hannes Hofmann
Mohammad Sabah, Mauro Cacace, Inga Berre, Iman R. Kivi, and Hannes Hofmann
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 20 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
We developed a new way to simulate earthquakes triggered by fluid injection deep underground. These events involve both slow pressure build-up and rapid fault movement, which are difficult to capture together. Our method combines two calculation approaches and switches between them when needed. It reproduces earthquake behavior accurately while reducing computing time by up to seventy percent, making it more practical for assessing risks in energy and storage projects.
Share