the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Acceleration After 2020 of Decreasing Earth Albedo from DSCOVR-EPIC 2015–2025 Compared with CERES 2000–2025
Abstract. The 10-year Earth albedo time series, its seasonal and wavelength dependence (10 wavelengths from 317.5 to 779.5 nm) of the illuminated Earth are estimated from radiance measurements by the Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera EPIC located in an orbit around the Earth-Sun Lagrange-1 point L1. The measurements were made at a backscattered observing phase angle ranging from 2° to 12°. The maximum albedo occurs at 340 nm, ranging from 0.33 in June to 0.38 in December. For shorter wavelengths, 325 and 317.3 nm, the albedo decreases sharply because of ozone absorption. For wavelengths longer than 340 nm (388, 443, and 551 nm) the albedo decreases gradually until about 680 nm where reflectivity from vegetation increases (680 and 779.5 nm). The maximum albedo occurs in December when the illuminated Antarctic ice sheet is observed. The EPIC solar flux weighted annual mean albedo in 2016 is estimated to be 0.298 (317.5 to 779.5 nm) and 0.293 in 2025, (-1.68% change) compared to the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) 2016 values of 0.289 and 0.284 in 2025 (-1.73% change) for the spectral range 300 to 5000 nm. The long-term trend of CERES albedo RAC (2000–2025.7) = -0.094±0.0007% yr-1 for a total linear change of 2.35% over 25 years, However, the albedo shows an accelerating decline after 2020, RAC (2020–2025.7) = 0.27 ± 0.001% yr-1 compared to RAC (2000–2020) -0.09 ± 0.0006% yr-1. Because the decline is non-linear, the total 25-year change is -2.7%. EPIC observes similar rates of albedo decline, RAE (2016–2019.5) = -0.18 ± 0.0006% yr-1 and RAE (2020.3–2025) = 0.25 ± 0.001% yr-1 validating the increased rate of albedo decline after 2020. This suggests that the accelerating reduced Earth reflection of sunlight back to space is enhancing global warming.
- Preprint
(7816 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1631', Vincent Kofman, 17 Jun 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jay Herman, 18 Jun 2026
- Dark side of the moon typically refers to the unseen portion of the moon, not the part that is lit by Earthshine. Revised to read “Photometric measurements are made of sunlight reflected from Earth to the dark portion of the crescent Moon and back to ground‑based telescopes”
Fig 7. Would suggest to keep the you axis scale the same throughout the panels to facilitate easier inter comparison between the brightness at the different times of year. Done
Sentence added: The EPIC measured Earth albedo includes the changing Sun-Earth distance.
- Could you elaborate a bit on why the albedo between CERES and EPIC are different? Is this mostly due to different viewing orientations or lower reflectivity in the near-to-mid infrared?
There are several differences in the two measurements that lead to different absolute albedo magnitudes. First, CERES albedo is measured in broadband from 300 to 5000 nm, while EPIC albedo is a sampling of 8 narrow band channels from 317.5 nm to 780 nm. The Earth albedo is dominated by the wavelengths corresponding to green (EPIC’s 551nm) and red (EPIC’s 680 nm). Second, CERES uses bi-directional reflectivity functions to stitch together diverse scenes. EPIC measures the total number of photons reaching the detector and assumes a Lambertian reflectivity. This paper does not address the absolute magnitude of the albedo needed for radiative balance calculations, but only the shape of the albedo time series.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jay Herman, 18 Jun 2026
- RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1631', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Sep 2026
-
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1631', Anonymous Referee #3, 29 Sep 2026
This manuscript performs a detailed intercomparison between top-of-atmosphere albedo products derived from two different data sources: the EPIC instrument aboard the DSCOVR platform, and the CERES mission. The paper looks at long-term trends in albedo from these two products, finding that there are statistically-significant decreases in albedo in both quantities, and that, in recent years, albedo decreases are accelerating. Additionally, the paper analyzes albedo at different wavelengths and explores seasonal and diel features of albedo, which is enabled by the location (around L1) and viewing capabilities (mostly daylit portion of Earth) of EPIC from the DSCOVR platform.
Overall, there is substantial information about albedo intercomparisons between products from two different missions, as well as the spectral and temporal breakdowns of albedo to make this manuscript compelling and potentially appropriate for publication. It is important for the scientific community to be aware that top-of-atmosphere, planetary-averaged albedo observations show that there are negative, and statistically-significant trends in this quantity. Furthermore, the independent findings from both EPIC and CERES that this quantity has been decreasing provide the Earth Radiation Budget community a high degree of confidence that albedo has been, in fact, decreasing. While previous assessments have intercompared different CERES flight models, the independent validation of CERES with EPIC presents far stronger independent validation that a validation across different CERES flight models. The spectral and temporal features from EPIC are also key for the scientific community that studies albedo.
At the same time, major revisions should be performed to address several issues in the current manuscript.
First, the trend analysis needs to include confidence intervals and the figures need to display such information. Performing trend analysis with end-points at different months, or over just a few years, can be quite problematic unless large confidence intervals are shown that reflect what is and is not significant.Second, the authors need to analyze the extent to which trends in atmospheric quantities in the near-infrared may be impacting the albedo products derived from EPIC in ways that differ from how those quantities impact albedo products derived from CERES. For example, water vapor absorption in the NIR can impact albedo, and increasing water vapor would lead to decreasing albedo, though EPIC measurements over spectral intervals mostly in the visible, are insensitive to these effects. The CERES instrument does measure across the near-infrared water vapor absorption bands, however. The authors need to show that water vapor trends either can or cannot explain the differences between EPIC and CERES albedo recovery since 2024. The authors also need to discuss what else in the near-infrared that are missing from EPIC measurements that could impact their EPIC time-series.
Third, the authors need to discuss the shared product development infrastructure between EPIC and CERES reflected shortwave radiation products. The authors cite various papers that discuss how CERES data and product processing pipelines are used to derive EPIC reflected shortwave radiation products, so the readers need to be aware of just how independent the EPIC and CERES products are from each otherFinally, the authors need to either discuss about the implications of these albedo trends for the Earth’s radiation budget and energy imbalance, which they indicate in their abstract as important, or remove that language from the manuscript.
On a minor note, the paper’s plain language summary needs to describe what CERES actually is to a reader who has not heard of this mission.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1631-RC3
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 608 | 351 | 76 | 1,035 | 38 | 43 |
- HTML: 608
- PDF: 351
- XML: 76
- Total: 1,035
- BibTeX: 38
- EndNote: 43
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
98. Dark side of the moon typically refers to the unseen portion of the moon, not the part that is lit by Earthshine.
Fig 7. Would suggest to keep the you axis scale the same throughout the panels to facilitate easier inter comparison between the brightness at the different times of year.
Fig 08. Maybe relevant to confirm these are from the scaled solar flux due to Sun-Earth distance. Same in lines 245 and on.
302. Could you elaborate a bit on why the albedo between CERES and EPIC are different? Is this mostly due to different viewing orientations or lower reflectivity in the near-to-mid infrared?