the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmospheric Simulation Chambers in the ACTRIS Research Infrastructure
Abstract. Atmospheric simulation chambers are one of the best available tools to study atmospheric processes, as they enable experiments under conditions that are both reproducible and well-controlled. 14 unique simulation chamber facilities are part of the distributed pan-European Aerosol, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure (ACTRIS). Their research focuses on fundamental gas-phase reaction kinetics, complex reaction mechanisms, aerosol formation and cloud chemistry, as well as other aspects of atmospheric processes. They use both simplified and complex air mixtures in their research. Results of chamber experiments enable the discovery of unknown chemical mechanisms and the determination of physicochemical parameters of atmospheric constituents. Simulation chambers are ideal for testing instruments and quality assurance of their data. The variability of their research capability is reflected in differences in the size (ranging from approximately 1 to 270 m3, the wall material, and the type of instrumentation used to measure physical parameters, gas-phase species, physicochemical properties of aerosol particles as well as cloud droplets and ice crystals. Most chambers in ACTRIS are indoors and use artificial light sources to initiate photochemical reactions while some chambers are located outside so that natural sunlight can be used. During experiments, steady state conditions may be achieved, the evolution of initial conditions may be observed, or expansion and mixing techniques may induce cloud formation. In this paper, the ACTRIS simulation chambers are described along with the quality control measures for carrying out experiments and reporting data. An overview of how users from the research community and industry can gain access to the ACTRIS simulation chambers and associated data centre is presented. Recent developments in the application of ACTRIS simulation chambers for answering current and future atmospheric research questions are discussed.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(5060 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 16 May 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1612', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Apr 2026 reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 132 | 99 | 8 | 239 | 5 | 8 |
- HTML: 132
- PDF: 99
- XML: 8
- Total: 239
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This manuscript presents a comprehensive overview of atmospheric simulation chambers within the ACTRIS research infrastructure, including their technical characteristics, instrumentation, quality assurance procedures, and application areas. The topic is timely and highly relevant, as simulation chambers play a crucial role in advancing gas-phase chemistry, secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation, and multiphase processes.
The manuscript is generally well organized and compiles detailed information on a wide range of chamber facilities across Europe. However, in its current form, the manuscript is overly descriptive and still lacks sufficient cross-platform synthesis, clear identification of key scientific questions, and a comprehensive summary of its major scientific contributions.
Specific Comments:
1. In the Introduction section, the authors list a large number of previous studies to illustrate the contributions of simulation chambers to atmospheric science, including structure–activity relationships, MCM/GECKO-A, HOMs, VBS, and mineral dust optical properties. However, this part mainly presents a compilation of references without sufficient synthesis. It remains unclear how these studies collectively advance mechanistic understanding, model development, or the interpretation of atmospheric observations. Further clarification and integration are needed.
2. The manuscript describes numerous applications, but the connection between specific chamber features (e.g., size, light source, material) and their suitability for particular research topics is not clearly articulated. Please clarify how different chamber designs enable different types of studies.
3. Given the importance of simulation chamber data for atmospheric modeling, could the authors clarify how ACTRIS chamber data are currently integrated into chemical transport models or mechanism development?
4. The current manuscript provides insufficient discussion of the inherent limitations of simulation chamber studies. In particular, key issues such as wall losses of both gas-phase species and particles, the use of precursor concentrations that deviate from real atmospheric levels, discrepancies between artificial light sources and natural solar radiation, and differences in chemical timescales compared to ambient atmospheric conditions should be addressed more thoroughly.
5. The manuscript would benefit from additional figures or schematics, such as classification diagrams or conceptual workflows, to better illustrate the diversity of chamber systems.