the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A Cubesat-optimized Magnetic Field Measurement Concept for Operation Beyond Low Earth Orbit
Abstract. This paper presents a CubeSat-optimized measurement concept for magnetic field, which was designed for missions beyond low Earth orbit targeting novel radiation belt studies. The instrument combines a miniaturized three-axis fluxgate sensor on a low‑mass deployable boom together with a compact sensor control unit that implements fully synchronous excitation, sampling, and digital control. A hybrid feedback module integrates three prototype fluxgate feedback microchips that provide low‑noise current sources with selectable full‑scale ranges (±3/±9 mA), enabling vector measurements over ±70 μT while retaining sub‑nT resolution. The boom provides 65 cm standoff from the CubeSat and pointing knowledge of 1°. The designed boom length limits the tolerable magnetic dipole moment inside the CubeSat to 0.05 Am2. Extended housekeeping includes voltage supply and thermal monitoring, an additional magneto‑inductive sensor on the sensor control unit for disturbance discrimination, and total ionizing dose tracking. Laboratory characterization demonstrates noise densities of 20–30 pT√Hz at 1 Hz, with 128 vectors per second science data and linearity suitable for near‑Earth fields. As it is a pivotal element in the instrument, the prototype feedback microchip was tested for its radiation response. Heavy‑ion testing showed no single‑event latch‑up up to 100 MeV cm2mg. Single‑event transients as well as single-event upsets were observed and are consistent with rare functional interrupts in the digital part of the signal chain. They are addressable by standard redundancy techniques. X‑ray tests up to 1 Mrad confirm functionality with worst‑case gain and offset drifts of approximately 600 ppmkrad and 1 μAkrad within 0–100 krad. The prototype meets the performance requirements derived from the Foresail‑2 mission concept and demonstrates a path to high‑quality, resource‑efficient magnetometry on 3U–6U CubeSat platforms suitable for operation in the Van Allen belts and other harsh radiation environments.
- Preprint
(32647 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1579', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Jul 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1579', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Aug 2026
This manuscript presents a miniature fluxgate magnetometer concept optimized for small-satellite platforms. The noise performance demonstrates outstanding results considering the mass and size constraints. However, several aspects must still be addressed.
- While not explicitly detailed in the text, Fig. 1 shows that the SCU is located near the CubeSat outer wall. Since platforms in LEO undergo steep thermal gradients during eclipse entries and exits, have the authors assessed the dynamic thermal behavior of the front-end electronics? For instance, any thermal lag between the housekeeping thermistor and the ASIC might introduce transient calibration offsets that require characterization.
- The feedback drive circuitry utilizes a Howland current source. However, this topology is sensitive to resistor ratio matching and differential thermal coefficient, which can easily unbalance the circuit and degrade its output impedance. Could the authors clarify the rationale behind selecting a Howland current source over alternative topologies that offer higher inherent stability against component tolerances? Additionally, given that the voltage reference often dominates the noise of the current source (especially at low frequencies), could the authors specify the chosen voltage reference and evaluate its contribution to the overall magnetometer noise budget?
- Pag 15, line 246: The authors state that "this phenomenon may be explained by a higher energy used to flip the magnetization of the soft magnetic cores in this design." Has this mechanism been experimentally verified?
- Pag 17, line 262: The substantially larger thermal drift reported on a single axis warrants further clarification beyond a potential "measurement error". If the behavior stems from a batch variation, discussing this in more detail would help reassure readers regarding the instrument's overall symmetry and reliability. The authors are encouraged to provide additional insights.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1579-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56 | 56 | 3 | 115 | 5 | 6 |
- HTML: 56
- PDF: 56
- XML: 3
- Total: 115
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The paper is well written and provides a good overview of the development of a CubeSat fluxgate magnetometer. It demonstrates the use of a newly developed current-feedback ASIC with high radiation tolerance in a compact instrument. However, there are several points that need to be addressed before publication.
Overall, the instrument design follows a sound approach and presents promising initial results. Although the performance of the feedback ASIC is not yet at the level required for a space mission, the paper provides a valuable demonstration of its integration into a compact fluxgate magnetometer. If the points raised above are adequately addressed, I recommend the paper for acceptance. I look forward to seeing the future development of this ASIC.