Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1469
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1469
23 Apr 2026
 | 23 Apr 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

WRF simulations of stratospheric gravity waves from Typhoon Soudelor (2015): sensitivity to microphysics, cumulus parameterization, and boundary layer schemes

Yen-Sen Lu, Lars Hoffmann, Xue Wu, Corwin J. Wright, and Neil P. Hindley

Abstract. Tropical cyclones are prominent sources of atmospheric gravity waves due to their intense and organized deep convection, yet the sensitivity of cyclone-induced gravity waves to model physics choices remains poorly constrained. Here, we examine how different physical parameterizations in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model influence the generation and characteristics of stratospheric gravity waves during the well-observed case of Typhoon Soudelor (2015). A suite of high-resolution simulations of the tropical cyclone employing multiple microphysics, planetary boundary layer, and cumulus parameterizations is analyzed. Gravity wave diagnostics are derived from vertical velocity variability and a localized S-transform spectral analysis. Although the simulations produce similar tropical cyclone tracks and intensities, they generate markedly different gravity wave responses. Differences in microphysics and boundary layer schemes lead to systematic variations in gravity wave amplitudes and spectral characteristics, while the inclusion of a cumulus parameterization consistently weakens deep convection and gravity wave amplitudes. These differences occur despite comparable background wind and stability conditions, demonstrating that gravity wave sensitivity is largely controlled by differences in diabatic forcing among the simulations. Our results highlight the critical role of model physics in shaping gravity wave generation and stratospheric wave characteristics and demonstrate the importance of carefully evaluating diabatic forcing in mesoscale modeling studies.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Yen-Sen Lu, Lars Hoffmann, Xue Wu, Corwin J. Wright, and Neil P. Hindley

Status: open (until 04 Jun 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Yen-Sen Lu, Lars Hoffmann, Xue Wu, Corwin J. Wright, and Neil P. Hindley
Yen-Sen Lu, Lars Hoffmann, Xue Wu, Corwin J. Wright, and Neil P. Hindley
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 23 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
We studied how computer models represent atmospheric waves triggered by intense tropical cyclones. We used a real typhoon as a case study to test how different mathematical descriptions of the atmospheric model affect these wave patterns. We found that small changes in model settings significantly impact the predicted waves in the upper atmosphere. This research helps scientists choose better model configurations to improve weather forecasts and our understanding of atmospheric science.
Share