the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Cold Spell That Never Happened: Climatological Assessment of the Winter 2025/26 Cold and Snowfall Episodes in Bucharest and Their Disproportionate Media Representation
Abstract. The winter of 2025/26 in Romania generated intense media coverage characterizing cold and snowfall episodes in Bucharest and south-eastern Romania as historically exceptional. Here, we evaluate this characterization against a multi-source climatological analysis spanning up to 148 years of instrumental records. Using daily minimum temperature data from Bucuresti Filaret station (1879–2026) and monthly mean temperatures from 65 stations across Romania, we show that both January and February 2026 were anomalously warm relative to the 1971–2000 baseline (country-mean anomalies of +2.3 °C and +2.2 °C, respectively), with positive temperature anomalies recorded at nearly all 65 stations. Cold spell detection, using the 10th percentile threshold of the daily minimum temperature (TN10p), confirmed zero cold spell days throughout the winter 2025/26. The principal high-impact event, the 18th of February 2026 blizzard, was driven by a classical Mediterranean cyclone characterized by an upper-level potential vorticity streamer and an anomalously high integrated water vapor transport directed towards south-eastern Romania. Content analysis of 89 Romanian and international media items (~112,400 words) reveals 692 alarm-vocabulary occurrences (6.2 per 1,000 words). Outlet alarm-vocabulary density correlates strongly and negatively with the provision of historical context (Pearson r = −0.88; p < 0.001). We interpret this amplification as consistent with both the Social Amplification of Risk Framework and a shifting experiential baseline mechanism. Our study demonstrates that heavy snowfall in a warming climate can occur in the complete absence of any thermal cold extreme, and underscores the practical consequences of conflating precipitation and temperature hazards in emergency communication, and proposes a standardized context protocol for national meteorological services.
- Preprint
(8100 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(3141 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 01 Jun 2026)
- CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1457', Ion Marinică, 23 Apr 2026 reply
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1457', Ion Marinică, 25 Apr 2026
reply
2026.04.24
In Romania, the Blizzard is well studied. From the classical specialists of old (e.g.: Ștefan Herpites) to the modern ones (e.g.: Ion Drăghici) who explained very well the synoptic and physical processes that occur during the Blizzard situation. In general, for Romania and the Balkan Peninsula there are two main types of Blizzard:
I. ) when the Cyclone-Anticyclone coupling is between a Mediterranean Cyclone (or Black Sea) and the East-European Anticyclone. This type of Blizzard is also called by specialists as "Eastern Blizzard" because the advection of cold air is made from the Eastern sector (from the East and Northeast). During the Blizzard, the air temperature is usually not very low but the wind intensification accentuates the feeling of cold, etc. Such a Blizzard is always followed by an intense cooling of the weather (cold wave or frost wave). It is the most common type of Blizzard.II. ) When the Cyclone-Anticyclone coupling is made between a Mediterranean Cyclone and an Atlantic Anticyclone or the ridge of such an anticyclone which can be Azoric or the ridge of a Greenland anticyclone and sometimes even Scandinavian, etc. (I will not go into details.) In this situation, the snowfalls are quantitatively important in the rear sector of the cyclone, and their diminution or cessation is made quite quickly. Such a Blizzard is also called by specialists as "Western Blizzard" because the advection of the cold air mass is made from the Western sector (West or frequently Northwest). It is known that generally after snowfalls, the weather cools down. It is also known that western blizzards are less frequent and the cooling that follows after the cessation or decrease of snowfall is not intense (due to the influence of the Atlantic Ocean). (I will not go into details.). In addition to these two main types, there are other blizzard situations without major importance.
Therefore, the cooling that followed the Blizzard was moderate and the forecast prepared by the ANM (Romania's elite institution) did not have any reference to an intense cooling of the weather or the appearance of a cold wave. The lowest thermal minimums were recorded on the morning of 19.II.2026 and from these I quote (excluding the mountain area): -13.0°C in Bacău (in Moldova), -9.6 °C in Ploiești in Muntenia), -5.0°C in Băneasa (in the Capital area), etc. The following day (20.II.2026) the minimums increased.
Although the scientific work of the authors Monica Ionita, Bogdan Antonescu, and Viorica Nagavciuc (The Cold Spell That Never Happened: Climatological Assessment of the Winter 2025/26 Cold and Snowfall Episodes in Bucharest and Their Disproportionate Media Representation) does not aim to provide a synoptic analysis of this winter's blizzard but only the amplifications made by the media, I added this comment to highlight that often various non-specialists are invited by television stations to make some comments that are usually amplifications of past, present or future atmospheric phenomena and processes. Most of the time, real specialists in the field of meteorology are not asked anything, as if they did not exist.
Additionally, in the last 25 years, the political factor has infiltrated climate science and as a result almost no one does science anymore but only politics (usually of the globalist type).
If politics enters science, the latter disappears and everyone does politics with the scent of science! To have science persevere, free of political commitment, it has to be based on true fundamental logic (binary mathematical logic, the true and correct one).It is important to protect and save man, because "the planet saves us and not the other way around".
I note again that the publication of this work is welcome.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1457-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-1457', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Apr 2026
reply
A question regarding the text search process. The authors clearly show how the 18th Feb 2026 event is not an extreme cold event and that the resulting snow accumulation is not historically unprecedented for Romania. Thus, any claim of such by the media would be inaccurate. In lines 436-437, it is stated “'unprecedented' appeared 40 times despite being factually incorrect for every observable metric of the 2026 winter”. However, could it not be argued that, as a single day snowfall event in Bucharest specifically, it is unprecedented, e.g. lines 389-391? Is there any screening of the search results to identify this, admittedly specific, example?
-
RC3: 'Reply on RC2', Ion Marinică, 30 Apr 2026
reply
30.IV.2026
Heavy snowfalls in a single day are quite common events (just as torrential rains are quite common), in winter and possible anywhere on Earth. Therefore, we cannot say that "heavy snowfall in a single day" is an exceptional meteorological event.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1457-RC3
-
RC3: 'Reply on RC2', Ion Marinică, 30 Apr 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201 | 178 | 11 | 390 | 70 | 10 | 18 |
- HTML: 201
- PDF: 178
- XML: 11
- Total: 390
- Supplement: 70
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Publisher’s note: this comment is a copy of RC1 and its content was therefore removed on 27 April 2026.